Where’s MJ?Twitter trolling on a role
By all reports we wanted him on a perm I think the player had issues with coming here for one reason or another.
Moody one for me this not sure if he’s fully committed to even coming here.
By all reports we wanted him on a perm I think the player had issues with coming here for one reason or another.
Moody one for me this not sure if he’s fully committed to even coming here.
The league one salary cap won’t affect us for a few years. If we go down each player that’s higher than the league average is set at the league average, rather than their actual salary. Think it’s 2500 ATM.If true, I think it's a shrewd move bringing Sheaf in on a loan with an option to buy. It's been well documented that the EFL have implemented a salary cap for all their League One and Two, with League One in particular being restricted to a fixed £2.5m spend on bonuses, wages, agent fees and other moneys paid to players. Focusing on League One, this is in place of the SCMP regulations that governed (or rather attempted to govern) financial sustainability and longevity of all members within the league. Given that our wage bill is likely to be considerably higher than last year's, I presume we are now subsequently exceeding this cap quite considerably - and in the event of CCFC dropping back down into League One (hopefully not), it's not improbable to suggest that we would still likely be far above the £2.5m threshold.
So, could it be that Robins and the backroom staff are simply thinking ahead, just in case we do in fact find ourselves in a relegation spot come the end of the season. I can't imagine that Sheaf is on small wages so it makes sense to structure the deal as a loan, with an option to buy just in case affordability becomes difficult in the event we are relegated - especially if we cannot move him on for whatever reason. After all, every transfer comes with its risks. Sheaf could rupture his ACL in true CCFC fashion or his form might plummet as we saw from signings such as Ogogo. Then we're inevitably stuck with his wages for the foreseeable. Hence why I believe this to be a wise move from the club.
Personally I cannot see this particular deal being made to avoid the current P&S (profit and sustainability rules) implemented in the Championship. To my knowledge the current rules state that each club is not permitted to lose over £13m per season over four years - (it used to be three but it has recently changed to four). It's highly doubtful that even in the current situation we're losing that much and regardless,
clubs will now be reporting on a four-year period that covers 2017/18-2020/21 instead of the three years that cover 2017/18-2019/20. The club's accounts have shown that we're definitely not losing that much, so for that particular scenario we're in the clear.
Apologies for the 'essay', just my little speculative take on it!
Do you ever stop sprouting bollocks?
There is no evidence for this, his position and his agents job is to get the best deal they can. They don’t owe the club anything
It’s gone from a perm fees agreed apparently to a loan maybe he wants to prove to Arsenal he’s good enough for them a strong season with us his contract is extended and he goes back there,no idea how the “option to buy” works with this one.But someone on twitter said it so it must be true
It surely just means we can buy him if we want to. Sounds like a good deal to me...‘try before you buy’.It’s gone from a perm fees agreed apparently to a loan maybe he wants to prove to Arsenal he’s good enough for them a strong season with us his contract is extended and he goes back there,no idea how the “option to buy” works with this one.
Doesn’t technically always work like that mate unfortunately we probably won’t know the terms of the deal etc alsoIt surely just means we can buy him if we want to. Sounds like a good deal to me...‘try before you buy’.
I’m pretty sure if the player wasn’t 100% committed Robins would have binned him off.By all reports we wanted him on a perm I think the player had issues with coming here for one reason or another.
Moody one for me this not sure if he’s fully committed to even coming here.
AgreedI’m pretty sure if the player wasn’t 100% committed Robins would have binned him off.
I’m going to put my trust in Robins over Twitter
It’s gone from a perm fees agreed apparently to a loan maybe he wants to prove to Arsenal he’s good enough for them a strong season with us his contract is extended and he goes back there,no idea how the “option to buy” works with this one.
Doesn’t it? I’d always assumed it does. Otherwise what’s the point?Doesn’t technically always work like that mate unfortunately we probably won’t know the terms of the deal etc also
I’d be pretty happy with him if he proves that he’s that good Arsenal want him back. We can then buy him and sell him at a 200% markupIt’s gone from a perm fees agreed apparently to a loan maybe he wants to prove to Arsenal he’s good enough for them a strong season with us his contract is extended and he goes back there,no idea how the “option to buy” works with this one.
By all reports we wanted him on a perm I think the player had issues with coming here for one reason or another.
Moody one for me this not sure if he’s fully committed to even coming here.
Was Stewart Robson the last midfielder we signed from Arsenal ? If Sheaf is half the player he was we've got a player.
Sheafo Hamer Hamer sheafo Hamer Hamer Sheafo Sheafo Sheafo Sheafo
Andy Turner reporting looks like it’s going to be a busy day ?
Maybe another coming in ? For a fee would maybe explain the loan with shea.
Graham Barrett?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?