Crikey. Looks a class above.
Crikey. Looks a class above.
Ffs we should have secured the permanent move lol
Maybe it a loan initially due to financial fair play rules.
We’ve already spent more money than we expected sisu to spend, so a loan for 12 months makes sense.
We get a good £5m more in basic award & solidarity payment compared to league one (£6.8m Vs approx £1.5m). Makes a big difference. Goes up to about £85m if you make the premier league.
85 mill pffft small change, but it's actually 100 mill minimumthen a guaranteed 70 million over 3 years if you're relegated
Not yetPlease excuse me if I've missed something but has it actually been confirmed ?
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Have people forgotten we sold McCallum and got promoted?
There’s definitely been some minor investment, likely spent on wages. I’d guess Walker at around £1m, and Hamer around £1.3m, which is less than we got for McCallum. Maybe loan fees for the three loanees?
I know for a fact we got £1.5mWe will have received a lot less than a million up front for McCallum
We will have received a lot less than a million up front for McCallum
I know for a fact we got £1.5m
He did if I recall correctly. From what I’ve heard there was around 1.5m upfront with a sell on clause and with not many add onsDidnt the commercial manager of Norwich at the time say it was a lot less than a million upfront?
Ffs we should have secured the permanent move lol
Perhaps. Perhaps we paid less than I’ve guessed for ours too. How much do you reckon the owners have put in this window?
Wonder show my h mcallum worth now if he had stayed. 5m?
If it is a loan with a view to buy I wonder if financial fair play is a reason not sure how that works and if there’s a difference in loaning than buying. Perhaps we are holding back the pennys for another.
This again...We will have received a lot less than a million up front for McCallum
This again...
The same as we won't have paid those outgoing sums in one up front fee either...
If it is a loan with a view to buy I wonder if financial fair play is a reason not sure how that works and if there’s a difference in loaning than buying. Perhaps we are holding back the pennys for another.
Well no as it’s possible as the top level headline fee is included to assume that is what we received - the published accounts in the end will reveal the truth
@betterdays .... if this proposed deal is correct I assume we have not only an exclusive option with Arsenal but the player is also obligated to join us too if we take up the option ??
No one can force him to agree terms.
I would think the homework will have been done can’t see Sheafs agent leaving the player high and dry should he get a serious injury. There’s a reason for the deal to be done this way.@betterdays .... if this proposed deal is correct I assume we have not only an exclusive option with Arsenal but the player is also obligated to join us too if we take up the option ??
And that was worth the wait wasn’t it? He was here all of five minutesyou clearly have'nt been briefed on the transfer policy - were you around for the Chaplin thread ?
And something about a third signing, possibly Walsh?The only thing I heard was a deal for Sheaf was more or less agreed two or three weeks ago but signing Tyler Walker was the priority and there was a last minute problem with that deal by another club staking a late interest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?