Genuine question. Why does it pain you to say that one of our players had a good game?
Odd.
This is what you get with Conor Thomas too unfortunately. Some don't want him to do well because it goes against their cast iron, set in stone, judgement upon him.
If you say a player can't tackle and is lazy then obviously you want that to be fully justified and recognised every game, for fear of looking a fool if they prove you wrong.
Same too with Barton. I've always said he can't work hard and is a luxury player that breezes through games. Well, on Saturday, he did harrass and harry and he worked hard.
I
have had an opinion on him, but that is not an opinion that is cast in stone or unwaivering. I have always been happy to accept that my opinion of him may well not be 100% accurate.
Too many pre-formed opinons clouding people's judgement on here at times I think.
When you get the likes of a 'Conor Thomas: Doing absolutely nothing since January 2011

' that appears as an automatic template at the bottom of every single post you make, you kind of have set out your stall and are never going to be swayed from that blinkered view.
We should all be happy Barton had a good game, whether you rate him or not and we should all recognise when Conor Thomas has a good game, whether you rate him or not.
I'm not a fan of Thomas, but when I come out and say he's had a good game, I get accused of being either his lover or a member of his family. :claping hands:
We should all be happy Barton played well, simple as and it most certainly shouldn't pain us in any way.