The runs sheffs been making has made space for other players. Barton doesn't have that movement. It's a moot point anyway, Robins won't drop sheff for Barton.
The runs sheffs been making has made space for other players. Barton doesn't have that movement. It's a moot point anyway, Robins won't drop sheff for Barton.
The runs sheffs been making has made space for other players. Barton doesn't have that movement. It's a moot point anyway, Robins won't drop sheff for Barton.
1 - stats are in no way the be all and end all of what makes a better player. 2 - no one else is saying drop sheff because the can see he's playing well. So yeah, it kind of seems like an agenda. 3 - its still a moot point.
1 - stats are in no way the be all and end all of what makes a better player. 2 - no one else is saying drop sheff because the can see he's playing well. So yeah, it kind of seems like an agenda. 3 - its still a moot point.
1 - that's why I said suggests. 2 - there are people saying drop Baker, is that an agenda? I believe it's an opinion, it is my opinion that McSheff shouldn't start, it isn't an agenda, I don't believe it's a problem, I just think Barton should start ahead of him. 3 - it is, but again, it's down to opinion.
Never been fan of player played win %... Why? Because this happens to more coincidental, at one point, England had a better win % when Emile Heskey started than Defoe, Crouch or Bent... All 3 are better than Emile Heskey and we all know it.
Never been fan of player played win %... Why? Because this happens to more coincidental, at one point, England had a better win % when Emile Heskey started than Defoe, Crouch or Bent... All 3 are better than Emile Heskey and we all know it.
Never been fan of player played win %... Why? Because this happens to more coincidental, at one point, England had a better win % when Emile Heskey started than Defoe, Crouch or Bent... All 3 are better than Emile Heskey and we all know it.