Good point but we can only go with the answers we're given. I suppose if two court cases, an administrator, the football league and ACL can't find the golden share we were struggling to get some clarity from the offset
I think by SISU hiding it is a green light for people to see them for what they are
Lets not jump the gun. I think it was the day the administrator was appointed, he may have been told or shown it and just said no as it would be something else he may have to deal with.
A few months ago when the Trust first said their goal was to make sure the fans got shares and representation on the board I said that would eventually make the Trust hostages as they would be part of decisions not all fans would applaud.
Well, this thread is the first taste of just that.
Imagine what would happen if a Trust member is part of a board that decides to close the acadamy or sell the top scorer to fund losses?
But I still think the Trust are right in not publishing the answers until the club says they can.
No, it was last Monday or Tuesday I think. SISU said they were talking to their lawyers about the impending court case and they advised them to tell us not to print due to the court case.
But ACL's didn't?
And there shouldn't be any animosity towards Jan. the questions were put to ACL and SISU who were told prior that it was the Trusts intentions so publish the answers. This was agreed by both parties. Once the answers were compiled the Trust, out of courtesy, contacted both ACL and SISU to advise the answers they were going to publish. ACL didn't have a problem. SISU came back with the sub judice message.
It wasn't anyone's intention to hold back any info, the trust was infact, attempting to gain info to clarify the situation.
As Jack said it's all a bit academic now anyway, but if Sisu withdrew their consent to the answers being published then I think it was sensible of the trust not to print them. The trust need to maintain some kind of relationship with Sisu while they are involved with the CCFC. In my opinion withdrawing consent just ended up being bad PR for Sisu - I think their capacity for self-inflicted harm is quite stunning.
Maybe not as bad as when their answers are published turkey
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?