Grendel
Well-Known Member
What would you say if you'd been told that you bid wouldn't be considered? What he said I guess especially as wasps chairman said without ownership and 365 day revenues sporting clubs have no future.
What does"we've moved on and are building a new ground" mean?
What would you say if you'd been told that you bid wouldn't be considered? What he said I guess especially as wasps chairman said without ownership and 365 day revenues sporting clubs have no future.
What would you say if you'd been told that you bid wouldn't be considered? What he said I guess especially as wasps chairman said without ownership and 365 day revenues sporting clubs have no future.
Rather than admit you backed the wrong horse, and that the policies you danced around and clapped with glee were those which destroyed the future of our football club; you won't face up to what was staring you in the face all along, and you're trying to find marginal fault in any other party you can.
What I don't understand is why people are angry because CCC didn't offer CCFC a deal they've gone on record saying they wouldn't have done.
And I don't understand why some people are so terrified that CCC may have been less than honest with the club or the taxpayer over the Wasps deal. Not saying they have, just saying that a lot on here seem pretty much hysterical over their defence of Lucas/CCC.
Surely, we want the truth and fine detail no matter who has helped shaft our club.
What if you've already had the truth?
Actually the one who isn't being truthful here is you.
That isn't what she is quoted as saying and you know it.
It is what she was quoted as saying in 2012.
What if you've already had the truth?
Who by?
As just about everyone knows it was Mutton that was quoted as saying it. But certain people seem to put it to AL frequently and say that it was her although never showing anything with the slightest evidence.
Handwritten notes from a meeting of Labour councillors, August 2012.
http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/2015/01/20/news-Hell-freezes-over-before-council-sells-Ricoh-to-Sky-Blues-125086.html
Handwritten by whom? I take it this was one of the meetings where notes were not taken?
So apparently "everyone knows" is not correct, which is why an independent review/audit/enquiry, call it what you will is a good idea. I'm sure everything will be fine and the Council have acted legally - though not morally - by the book. Fair enough.
The same should be done on all aspects that have led us to where we are now. And there should not be anywhere to hide for all those guilty of leading us to where we are now. I would start with the time Richardson was at our club.
And what if we haven't? Does it matter if it's checked and double-checked? What are you worried about?
Actually the one who isn't being truthful here is you.
That isn't what she is quoted as saying and you know it.
And I don't understand why some people are so terrified that CCC may have been less than honest with the club or the taxpayer over the Wasps deal. Not saying they have, just saying that a lot on here seem pretty much hysterical over their defence of Lucas/CCC.
Surely, we want the truth and fine detail no matter who has helped shaft our club.
What are you expecting "the truth" to be? This whole quest for "the truth" has smoking gun part 2 written all over it and I doubt whether SISU, LR and the "more knowledgeable" posters on here will accept it so we can look forward to smoking gun part 3.
I'd like to know when we can move on from the conspiracy theories and start concentrating on our one great football club and how it moves in that direction.
This whole "we want the truth" is a smoke screen created to distract from the real failings and I'm gobsmacked by the number of people falling for it and promoting it. Although I'm not gobsmacked by the ones falling for it.
Just in the same way you did with Thorny eh? As your comment goes to show, you have little interest in the football club and are more interested in getting one over on sisu.
True. She wrote it, I think.
We are not terrified we are just pissed off with a few looking for a smoking gun.
We can be almost certain the audit will show no unlawful wrong doing.
It hopefully will show the details on why the Wasps bid was considered and hopefully once and for all show Sisu for what they are.
Although the JR shows this anyway, a few people are disregarding it because of the continuous appeals.
We have a common goal to get rid of Sisu. I don't think we have anybody who wants them here?
Our common efforts should be to get rid of them in a way to suit the club.
IMHO they need to be pushed to put it up for sale and see what the interest is.
This won't happen until the JR is over, because they still believe that there is compensation money in it for them.
In the meantime we need to make them aware that we want them out at very opportunity.
Perhaps picking off individuals first. I suggest changing the battle to "Fisher Out" as attacking Sisu falls on deaf ears.
I am sure it was said to have been said by AL until it was proven to have been said by Mutton. The only problem is that if a lie or untruth is said enough people start to believe it.......unless the evidence shows the opposite like Fisher getting another stadium built.
Getting rid of Fisher wouldn't do much to help us. Joy would just get another mouthpiece to piss us all off with.
I am sure it was said to have been said by AL until it was proven to have been said by Mutton. The only problem is that if a lie or untruth is said enough people start to believe it.......unless the evidence shows the opposite like Fisher getting another stadium built.
It's a target to go at and I can't stand him since he addressed us at those meetings.
We are not terrified we are just pissed off with a few looking for a smoking gun.
We can be almost certain the audit will show no unlawful wrong doing.
It hopefully will show the details on why the Wasps bid was considered and hopefully once and for all show Sisu for what they are.
Although the JR shows this anyway, a few people are disregarding it because of the continuous appeals.
We have a common goal to get rid of Sisu. I don't think we have anybody who wants them here?
Our common efforts should be to get rid of them in a way to suit the club.
IMHO they need to be pushed to put it up for sale and see what the interest is.
This won't happen until the JR is over, because they still believe that there is compensation money in it for them.
In the meantime we need to make them aware that we want them out at very opportunity.
Perhaps picking off individuals first. I suggest changing the battle to "Fisher Out" as attacking Sisu falls on deaf ears.
She got her wish anyway and SISU/CCFC never got the Arena.
Come on, Tony. Don't deflect. As I said, it's a good thing isn't it to look at the whole process. You're convinced - and chances are you're spot on - that everything was done by the book, so why are you so edgy and feel you have to wade in with all the talk of "consipracy theories", etc.
I'll say it, so it's clear, I AM SURE CCC HAVE DONE EVERYTHING AS THEY SHOULD, so there's nothing to be defensive about.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?