I totally agree that this has been a superb effort by those involved. We seem to be just drifting into permanent exile and potentially oblivion. We have invested too much over the years to allow this to happen.Didn’t agree with attacking fans who have tried, but got to say well done on following this through guys. Always a fan of people self organising to get a voice even if I don’t agree with what they’re saying. It’s good for society.
Top work Pete.
Back at youDidn’t agree with attacking fans who have tried, but got to say well done on following this through guys. Always a fan of people self organising to get a voice even if I don’t agree with what they’re saying. It’s good for society.
Top work Pete.
Nick Eastwood - received and noted
I did ask him to refer it to the person at wasps who can take action as outlined in the statement. I assume it’s not him
David Conn??? LMAO!Might be worth tweeting/email national journalists who have covered the story before and general football writers and so on.
only takes one of them to pick up on the story.
So if we have had responses from Trish and Lego, why the fuck haven't they broadcast anything about it? They fucking would if it was the Trust or Johnson!
That’s really useful yep couldn’t could weHave tried to clarify that it isn't speaking on behalf of all fans. It can only represent those who voted and isn't trying to say "every CCFC fan thinks x,y and z".
If people want to agree or disagree with the points and they haven't voted or never been on here, that's fine.
Not trying to represent every fan.
Was just about to suggest the same, as catching up on this thread. Well done!Don't know if anyone already done this but I've just emailed it to the Totally Football League Podcast. They've spoken about our situation before and actually seem to care, figured they'd be responsive to this sort of statement
Cheers! All thanks to Pete et al, I am just a humble messengerWas just about to suggest the same, as catching up on this thread. Well done!
I’m using my email and mobile to get things driven with the statementOnly criticism @Sky Blue Pete is that I'd have used your real name rather than forum name. Appreciate it's a leap but may be taken more seriously.
Nick, do you know how many people have logged in to the site since the poll was opened and how many people have actually looked at the vote thread? Knowing those numbers might help with the challenge of the proportion of the total users who supported the statement is brought up. If all 7000 odd have looked at it the “5%” comment might be fair comment, whilst obviously if only 500 have looked at it there is a different spin on things.Have tried to clarify that it isn't speaking on behalf of all fans. It can only represent those who voted and isn't trying to say "every CCFC fan thinks x,y and z".
If people want to agree or disagree with the points and they haven't voted or never been on here, that's fine.
Not trying to represent every fan.
Gathering pace now guys, great work.
I've messaged lots of football writers, podcasts, other fan groups with large followings and so on. Fingers crossed some bite.
Henry Winter has put out various things about our plight before. Fingers crossed.
Thanks GrendelIve dome the same trying to get them to bite that it’s cup game and sold out so a good time to put the statement out
As I said, the issue isn’t the sample size but the sampling method. There’s a good argument that only those that agree with the sites overall position stick around and therefore they are the only ones who see it. The Internet is great a siloing people off into hive minds.
Not attacking it, just steel manning the argument in case it’s raised. It’s worth thinking about how you will respond.
People can disagree with it though, can't they?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?