All-purpose tennis thread (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Nadal through to the SF, looking likely another Nadal v Djokovic final. I’m hoping someone different for a change.

Some real concern about his fitness it was experience that got him over against a mediocre opponent. Let’s hope he has enough to beat the man who thinks it’s ok to slap women around on Friday
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
Some real concern about his fitness it was experience that got him over against a mediocre opponent. Let’s hope he has enough to beat the man who thinks it’s ok to slap women around on Friday

Nadal has withdrawn due to his injury.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
I hope Kyrgios doesn't win. I wanted to put a bet on him to be outright winner and my account on bet365 wasn't working (laws are really funny aboard). VPN wouldn't work either and in the end I gave up. That was a few rounds ago. If he goes on to win it I'll be fuming.
 

stay_up_skyblues

Well-Known Member

Seems a bit unfair getting a bye to final. Would it not make more sense for one of the losers from the last round to step in? Perhaps the best performing based on some stats/data along the lines of goal difference in footy?

A semi final must take it out of you so Norrie or Djokovic already at a disadvantage in the final. I’m sure it’s the rule and there is precedent but…
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member

Seems a bit unfair getting a bye to final. Would it not make more sense for one of the losers from the last round to step in? Perhaps the best performing based on some stats/data along the lines of goal difference in footy?

A semi final must take it out of you so Norrie or Djokovic already at a disadvantage in the final. I’m sure it’s the rule and there is precedent but…

Good shout, the player who lost to Nadal in the QF would be the best option but I guess he may already be back in the states?
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
After some really superb tennis he’s now resorted to ranting and raving at the officials, crowd and his own family. He is a twat.
An absolute bellend. Worse than McEnroe was with this childish behaviour and nowhere near as good a player And to compound matters he wears his hat the wrong way round with the peak up.
 
Last edited:

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
That comment he just made about the woman in the dress was funny.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
He clearly isn't responsible for any mistakes he is making in this match. Everyone else is.
 

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
Stopped watching it…. He’s an absolute cockhole
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Couldn't find a Wimbledon thread, anyone watch Murray last night?

Whatever the final result when the match resumes today, he was phenomenal last night, 36 years old, metal hip and all his injuries and the torrid time he's had, the turned the clock back 10 years with that performance.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Couldn't find a Wimbledon thread, anyone watch Murray last night?

Whatever the final result when the match resumes today, he was phenomenal last night, 36 years old, metal hip and all his injuries and the torrid time he's had, the turned the clock back 10 years with that performance.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
He was phenomenal the standard was So so high
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Couldn't find a Wimbledon thread, anyone watch Murray last night?

Whatever the final result when the match resumes today, he was phenomenal last night, 36 years old, metal hip and all his injuries and the torrid time he's had, the turned the clock back 10 years with that performance.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Certainly the best he has played since the operation. Only worry is whether that pain that he seemed to be suffering in the penultimate point means anything sinister. I hope not as he has been an amazing player.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
So unlucky for Murray. His serve just let him down in that 5th set, kept going til the end. Heroic effort.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
So unlucky for Murray. His serve just let him down in that 5th set, kept going til the end. Heroic effort.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Would have won if they'd have continued last night. Had momentum, was serving really well and had Tsitsipas on the ropes.
Real shame.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Ben Shelton has just hit a 143 mph second serve at Advantage to win the game.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well done to Coco Gauff - great performance and a great speech afterwards - what a star she’s going to be
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
He's just still too good for these young lads , maybe next year
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
What a brilliant comeback by Sinner, coming back from 2 sets down to beat Medvedev to win the Aussie Open.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Yes after a slow start was a really interesting game.

The Sinner v Alcaraz contest in the coming years should be interesting.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Remarkably Jannick Sinner has managed to "negotiate" his ban down from 1-2 years but a minimum of a 1 year ban (which is what WADA advised) to a 3 month ban, for 2 failed drug tests. Loses no points, no trophies, etc from the time he was playing while doping (deliberately or accidentally doesn't matter). Will be back in time to play the French Open.

Lower ranked players have had 1-2 year bans for similar.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Remarkably Jannick Sinner has managed to "negotiate" his ban down from 1-2 years but a minimum of a 1 year ban (which is what WADA advised) to a 3 month ban, for 2 failed drug tests. Loses no points, no trophies, etc from the time he was playing while doping (deliberately or accidentally doesn't matter). Will be back in time to play the French Open.

Lower ranked players have had 1-2 year bans for similar.
If they're only going to give a short suspension, and missing no grand slams, because it was non-performance enhancing then surely you look at changing the rules to not ban non-performance enhancing drugs.

Why are they even banned in the first place?
 

Il Pirata

Well-Known Member
That's more the question, considering this:
In a statement on Saturday, Wada said it accepted the three-time Grand Slam champion "did not intend to cheat", that the drug "did not provide any performance-enhancing benefit" and this happened "without his knowledge as the result of negligence of members of his entourage".
The ban seems more a punishment on behalf of his medical staff, and for Wada to retain legitimacy as their rules don't make a lot of sense. I get the hard line on drugs in sport, but the idea of a "drug cheat" doesn't seem to apply here. There were also cultural inferences, which the various Italian agencies need to sort out, as it's a bad look for their leading sportsman to be involved in this.

The worst thing for Sinner is really the stigma that will follow him, at least for some years.

The unfairness here is how he was allowed to compete whilst being investigated and the shorter time it took to reach a decision. But one guy is the #1 player and others are #300, so it shouldn't surprise anyone.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top