Won't the fact acl refused mediation go against their claim?
Not sure what you mean by this.
When a financial agreement is made all correspondence between parties needs to be done between who is sorting things out. In our case this was Appleton. As we know he didn't do it. This is not just football. This is any financial agreement. SISU keep saying ACL wouldn't talk to them. They would have broken financial rules if they did speak directly with them. It is SISU that have refused any sort of mediation. Just like the one from Friday where Hoffman wanted to talk to Fisher at the game. Fisher said he didn't see how the Hoff had the right to.
The FL should have known that ACL couldn't talk to SISU.....or whatever they want to call themselves now. This should all be made clear tomorrow when the meeting with ACL and the FL happens. I would say this is why Appleton has offered to mediate now. He should already have done it. That is what part of what his job was to do. Did SISU want this though?
I can't see how SISU can take us to Northampton legally. I can't see how the FL can be against us playing at the Ricoh. All the truth will come out now. There is an offer of playing at the Ricoh rent free whilst in admin. Then there is an offer from the Hoff to cover any rent. The rent will be taken out of ticket sales. Much higher ticket sales at the Ricoh will mean a much more higher income than at Northampton. A stumbling block might mean SISU complain. All this money would be due to go to the academy. This belongs to SISU, but not straight onto their balance sheet.
This is where I start to see this as a possible good move by ACL. We play at the Ricoh. ACL then refuse to agree with what SISU have offered. We still play at the Ricoh rent free. So now do SISU carry out with their promise of attempting to liquidate? If not then Timmy loses face. He would already a bit with us playing at the Ricoh. Liquidation is a last resort. Our club don't have much in the way of equity. Higgs owns the training area they had built. ACL own the stadium. SISU seem to think that 25% of debts paid whilst in admin is good. If they try to liquidate us an offer of 25% could be made by someone else. An offer of 15m approx would cover this. So to me liquidation wouldn't work. Even SISU would make more back from this. A new owner would have the Ricoh for the £400,000 pa that has been offered to SISU. If they ended up being a decent owner they would get the chance of owning the ground.
I personally think this is why Fisher is trying his best to keep us out of Cov. Why else would they lose lots more money and alienate the fans by moving to Northampton?