No future with SISU
New Member
What is a normal forum?
What is a normal forum?As I say PWKH is on safe ground here. He would not identify himself on a normal forum. My opinion of him is that he is an egotist and has zero interest in the welfare of the club and its fans. He wouldn't even consider it without the knowledge there are stupid gushing sycophants who hang on to his every word.
Yes Peter you can
Ha ha. I wish I could be arsed to find that post you made about me where you were going of on one about how pathetic I was for referring to RFC as Mark. Whatever it was you said, right back at ya.
Not really. In this instance the comment is entirely justified. Why would a poster try and answer a question on Peter's behalf. Its logical as they are so interested in questions to Peter that they are indeed Peter.
I love how my post history is getting psycho-analysed. Have I upset you because i don't quite buy into the anti-SISU bandwagon?
As for the SISU plant... That one gets funnier every time...
Let me also clarify my cash cow comment. For years I was going to games thinking why don't the club lower ticket prices.. Fill the ground and make it up from other sales. And now I know why they didn't. This isn't a SISU exclusive problem it would have been the same for the previous lot. I know that there was the loan through ACL which would be serviced by the rent, but very event CCFC hosted - ACL profited from with F&B, parking, sponsorship and other streams.They wouldn't have secured the Ricoh sponsorship without the football club being there (which incidentally is up for renewal in 2015... That will be interesting) so they did secure a lot of monies with minimal effort..
You can see why they don't want to give them up. But if I park at Ricoh or buy a pie or even a hospitality box....I want that money to go to CCFC - not some venture fund put together by the council. Is that so unreasonable?
sisu are under the impression that acl and council wont deal with them.
i mean they were told that outright. only deal with adminsitrator.
so no deal could be done then.
and since admin ended it dont look like a new deal has been offered.
If the Club wanted the money from parking--pies--hospitality boxes etc, WHY did THEY SELL those rights?. Having sold them why should they get them back for free?.
Why not? Why if you supported the club would you want that? Only a cretin or a troll would want that. Which are you?
Why not? Why if you supported the club would you want that? Only a cretin or a troll would want that. Which are you?
Why not? Why if you supported the club would you want that? Only a cretin or a troll would want that. Which are you?
Not really. In this instance the comment is entirely justified. Why would a poster try and answer a question on Peter's behalf. Its logical as they are so interested in questions to Peter that they are indeed Peter.
Why not? Why if you supported the club would you want that? Only a cretin or a troll would want that. Which are you?
With that logic why don't we get CCC to double the council tax and donate all the extra money to the club. You would be in favour of that if you supported the club wouldn't you? Surely only a cretin or a troll would be against that.
So you don't want a charity to get their money back. What does that make you?
I'd support it.
You don't exactly live in Coventry do you ?
I'd support it.
There are plenty of people... just have a look at Twitter.
Ian do you think Les Reid could post on here as himself if he wanted to? Like Simon does. Les was quite straight speaking in the CET. Would it impact in him somehow to do the same here?
You don't exactly live in Coventry then , do you ?
I guess so as he did on Twitter before going quiet
It's weird as a Cov fan why he can't express his views anymore even if he is off the job
No idea, obviously something there I guess. The same as Simon can't come on and say "I think so and so are wankers".
But les isn't saying anything on here 'as Les'
He probably saw the shit Linnell got
Surprise you haven't started a thread demanding an apology from him for something...
I mean he probably saw the crap SL got when he posted on here. Why would he want to come on here and get that?
I mean he probably saw the crap SL got when he posted on here. Why would he want to come on here and get that?
The thing that annoyed me about Les' agenda was in my humble opinion it is easy to gig into a charity and a council as they are generally bound by law and legislation that makes them accountable.
So the stuff he was finding out was probably good but where was the hard journalism. Where was he finding out the stuff about a hedge fund notoriously secretive. Where was the info about the what's happening in the Cayman Islands where was the pressure for info about the new stadium etc etc.
it never happened because in my opinion that is harder to do.
To be fair didn't someone fairly recently out shhmee who is only the relative of someone who is more involved in this and haven't there been some fairly unsubtle posts about OSB's 'agenda'?
I think Schmee outted himself, people seemed to know anyway.
While I agree that even if you did work for somebody, you don't always agree with them. Could you imagine if I said I had worked foe SISU for a day?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?