Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (81 Viewers)

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Ruling out one of the most complete midfielders I have ever seen in a City shirt since 1980 seems premature to me. Grimes is absolute class and the first name on the team sheet this season and next.
most complete? except the fact he doesn’t score or have any pace. Torp is more complete than him
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Ruling out one of the most complete midfielders I have ever seen in a City shirt since 1980 seems premature to me. Grimes is absolute class and the first name on the team sheet this season and next.
Nobody is ruling him out or saying anything bad about him, it’s just the pace of the premier league could be an issue. He’s my favourite cov player
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
You think we'll be spending over 100 mill then?
No chance we will be spending that big, but there will be plenty of PL fringe players coming out of contract, or in their last year that will be available within our budget.
And we will no doubt be looking at European league players as well.

Frank will still need to perform a miracle to keep us up, presuming we get there of course.
 

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Completely overhauling a team that got promotion seems to be working for Sunderland as it did for Forest before them, but as I mentioned previously both needed to do so having only been promoted via the play offs, and so had a weaker starting position than those promoted automatically.

It doesn't always work though. Ipswich previously had a similar team ethic that we seem to have this season and spent big in the PL, but having then been relegated and despite having a very strong squad on paper, are struggling to find that togetherness they previously had.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
Think some people aren't appreciating the gulf between the prem and the championship.

We've seen teams get 90-100+ points in the champ and absolutely sink without trace in the prem. And some of the more successful promoted teams (like Sunderland) spend £££ and basically replace the entire starting 11.

Unfortunately I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of Grimes, Saka, EMC, BTA, Torp etc. are just out of their depth post promotion.
 

procdoc

Well-Known Member
There is little room for sentiment in modern football unfortunately. Should we achieve promotion a majority of the team would need replacing to even have a chance of staying up, that’s the reality
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBT

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
Think some people aren't appreciating the gulf between the prem and the championship.

We've seen teams get 90-100+ points in the champ and absolutely sink without trace in the prem. And some of the more successful promoted teams (like Sunderland) spend £££ and basically replace the entire starting 11.

Unfortunately I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of Grimes, Saka, EMC, BTA, Torp etc. are just out of their depth post promotion.

I’d expect us to have an unrecognisable team compared to now if we wanted to stay up.
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
You think we'll be spending over 100 mill then?
Interesting article in today's ST, which said, if I have this right:-

1. Sunderland are way out performing previous promoted teams
2. They spent £160m in the summer
3. That may seem a stupendous amount of money, but their parachute payments would be £200m or so were they to go down.
4. So they are covered
5. His argument was that parachute payments give a promoted team a chance to compete.

In which case were the owners of Luton and Southampton remiss?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Interesting article in today's ST, which said, if I have this right:-

1. Sunderland are way out performing previous promoted teams
2. They spent £160m in the summer
3. That may seem a stupendous amount of money, but their parachute payments would be £200m or so were they to go down.
4. So they are covered
5. His argument was that parachute payments give a promoted team a chance to compete.

In which case were the owners of Luton and Southampton remiss?
Of course nothing wrong with spending big to try to survive

We had people on here bigging up litons business and look what happened. Meanwhile they laughed at forests window with nonsense about too many new players to gel etc and they stayed up
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
Of course nothing wrong with spending big to try to survive

We had people on here bigging up litons business and look what happened. Meanwhile they laughed at forests window with nonsense about too many new players to gel etc and they stayed up
Spend nothing = You are almost certainly doomed
Spend big = at least you are giving yourself a chance
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
Am I being really naive thinking if we are still well ahead of the pack come January, we will basically have the pick of available Prem loans and a huge queue of agents knocking on our door saying their players would love to sign for us? Is 4-5 in that big a leap?
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
If we manage it think we’d have to spend big especially now we own the arena and infrastructure is in a good place.

Think out of the first team I’m a bit optimistic but think Rushworth, MVE, Thomas, Grimes, Rudoni and Wright could all start. With other players playing a role throughout the season.

Anyway need to focus on getting over the line in January first. Would if there is an eye on a big loan ala Sunderland last jan
 

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
I would be shocked if we spent £100m if we got promoted. I'd imagine Doug would pay off the mortgage on the CBS first, then spend circa £40m on the squad and the balance on increased player wages and infrastructure.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Am I being really naive thinking if we are still well ahead of the pack come January, we will basically have the pick of available Prem loans and a huge queue of agents knocking on our door saying their players would love to sign for us? Is 4-5 in that big a leap?

Yes because it's completely unnecessary.

The worst thing you can do with a winning side is flood it with new players, especially when they aren't really needed.

Bringing in that many players in a January window is usually only reserved for the desperate.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I don't even think that's bare minimum, at this stage that's all that we really need.

It's a false economy to flood a settled and well performing side with a load of players half way through a season.

A couple of new additions should be more than ample to see us through to the end of the campaign.

I think ideally we want two wingers and probably a CM and an AM
 

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
Am I being really naive thinking if we are still well ahead of the pack come January, we will basically have the pick of available Prem loans and a huge queue of agents knocking on our door saying their players would love to sign for us? Is 4-5 in that big a leap?

I can't see us getting that many loans in during the January window.

The parent clubs will want their players to get plenty of game time and I think we only need, at most, 1-2 starters plus 1-2 squad players. I wouldn't want to disrupt the team with too many starters if we are still running away with the league. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

procdoc

Well-Known Member
I would be shocked if we spent £100m if we got promoted. I'd imagine Doug would pay off the mortgage on the CBS first, then spend circa £40m on the squad and the balance on increased player wages and infrastructure.
If we only spent 40m in the premier league relegation would be guaranteed. King and Lampard have far ambition than that
 

Winny the Bish

Well-Known Member
I would be shocked if we spent £100m if we got promoted. I'd imagine Doug would pay off the mortgage on the CBS first, then spend circa £40m on the squad and the balance on increased player wages and infrastructure.
After watching 17th placed West Brom pull apart our defence yesterday, I’d be terrified of what Premier League attacks would do to us if we only spent £40m.
 

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
Yes because it's completely unnecessary.

The worst thing you can do with a winning side is flood it with new players, especially when they aren't really needed.

Bringing in that many players in a January window is usually only reserved for the desperate.

I agree.

I was typing to make the same point as you were posting 👍
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top