procdoc
Well-Known Member
Ah ok, I assumed they were banned from paying fees for transfers and loansThey can, they just have to get it approved by the FL first
Ah ok, I assumed they were banned from paying fees for transfers and loansThey can, they just have to get it approved by the FL first
I didn’t read it properly I assumed it was about the winger from palaceHe’s a Centre midfielder, hardly a forward player
Ridiculous.We need to go all in on Hughes else our defence won’t have been improved
Or they were the two targets and now we don’t have another forward option coming in…With Godo off to France and Boving off to Germany, the forward player remains something of a mystery, which is quite exciting.
I think people are questioning whether he’s an upgrade on Thomas and Kitch, not the squad.Quite amused by people saying Woolfenden isn't really an upgrade etc.
Simple question: would he better for us than Binks, the player he would be a direct replacement for?
Almost certainly yes. I will be pleased if we do get him.
Patrick Bamford. Hope notIs this a clue?
Spamfraud?Patrick Bamford. Hope not
Explain to me how a proven CH at this level doesn’t strengthen our defence?Says the guy that thinks we should drop Torp![]()
Wolfenstein series are cracking games!Still at hospital but really want to convert this into Woolfenden 3D. Maybe add ‘Woolfie’ to be holding the weapon
View attachment 45645
I’m not saying he won’t. I’ll judge him with my own eyes if/when he plays for us.Explain to me how a proven CH at this level doesn’t strengthen our defence?
He would fit in. Speaks with an accent exceedingly rare, in football.Patrick Bamford. Hope not
Honestly, I’m just putting the pictures together to get the name! Nothing to do with me!He would fit in. Speaks with an accent exceedingly rare, in football.
You said if we don’t get Hughes our defence wouldn’t be stronger. Woolfenden isn’t Hughes.I’m not saying he won’t. I’ll judge him with my own eyes if/when he plays for us.
Is this a clue?
I think Hughes is better than Thomas and Kitching. I’m not sure Woolfenden is yetYou said if we don’t get Hughes our defence wouldn’t be stronger. Woolfenden isn’t Hughes.
L1 player would strenghten the squad?Woolfenden's not had a lot of football in the last year. I see him as another L1/lower champ player like a few is out team/squad but that seems to be the market that we're in. Would strengthen the squad.
From the article the Ipswich fan write he sounds like a class act who could have a grimes like effect on usWoolfenden sounds like Ipswich version of Josh Eccles, does a job when required, came through the academy and been part of a successful team but just lacking an edge at the top level. Hope he does we'll but I'm not convinced about this signing.
Woolfenden sounds like Ipswich version of Josh Eccles, does a job when required, came through the academy and been part of a successful team but just lacking an edge at the top level. Hope he does well but I'm not convinced about this signing.
Not sure how the player is comparable to Eccles in any way at all tbhWoolfenden sounds like Ipswich version of Josh Eccles, does a job when required, came through the academy and been part of a successful team but just lacking an edge at the top level. Hope he does we'll but I'm not convinced about this signing.