Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (93 Viewers)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date May 7, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 259
  • 260
  • 261
  • 262
  • 263
  • …
  • 270
Next
First Prev 261 of 270 Next Last

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:29 AM
  • #9,101
Perennial Lurker said:
Totally agree but there are surely other areas that need addressing first .
The most important thing for me is the drop off in quality when the first choices aren't fit ,rested, suspended . Eccles offers very little drop off in that respect but look at Binks ,Lati,BTA , Bassette and the drop off is considerable
Click to expand...
With Allen I feel if he was has one good game(which he often does) it buys him enough credit for a run of 4-5 shit ones with many fans. Other players do not get that same mercy

We can't have that though and he needs to go

Striker wise I still think BTA is a good player tbh. If he dribbled past 3 plYers and loses it people focus on losing it solely. He gets no mercy from majority of fans unlike Allen

Id sell Simms if good offer came in. He just doesn't seem to be trying very hard to change his fortunes. A shame as when he caught fire 2 years ago it was great
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:31 AM
  • #9,102
Our xGA (which you might say is a measure of how many chances we give up) was 52.6 last season, vs 55.9 the season before and 54.7 the 2022/23 play off season. We have two very good centre halfs, a reasonable back up in Lati and somebody in Binks who has lost his way a bit.

It is lower priority imo to addressing our goalscoring problem, especially as goals can have such an impact on the flow of a game. It'd be interesting to see what the game state was when we conceded (i.e. do we concede mostly when level in games)?
 
Reactions: Fusilier and Perennial Lurker

Balli001

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:32 AM
  • #9,103
Perennial Lurker said:
Who is an upgrade on Eccles ?
I keep seeing this posted on here like it's an easy solution
Click to expand...
Thats why we have a scouting team. They cover al over the world. Im fairly sure there is an upgrade on Eccles somewhere on the planet
 
P

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:35 AM
  • #9,104
Balli001 said:
Thats why we have a scouting team. They cover al over the world. Im fairly sure there is an upgrade on Eccles somewhere on the planet
Click to expand...
I'm not suggesting there isn't but it's the glib manner that some think it's an easy fix
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:36 AM
  • #9,105
fernandopartridge said:
Our xGA (which you might say is a measure of how many chances we give up) was 52.6 last season, vs 55.9 the season before and 54.7 the 2022/23 play off season. We have two very good centre halfs, a reasonable back up in Lati and somebody in Binks who has lost his way a bit.

It is lower priority imo to addressing our goalscoring problem, especially as goals can have such an impact on the flow of a game. It'd be interesting to see what the game state was when we conceded (i.e. do we concede mostly when level in games)?
Click to expand...
I disagree with this tbh, goalscoring really isn’t an issue. We scored 64 goals last season which was more than Sheff United and only 5 less than Burnley. The reason they finished on considerably more points than us is simply goals conceded. We conceded the most in the top 11 and more than 19th, 20th and 21st.
 
Reactions: marrrkjay_ccfc and shmmeee

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:37 AM
  • #9,106
Perennial Lurker said:
I'm not suggesting there isn't but it's the glib manner that some think it's an easy fix
Click to expand...
Well the retort to people suggesting we upgrade asking "WHO THEN" is equally as moronic.
 
Reactions: Perennial Lurker

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:37 AM
  • #9,107
Skyblue_CP said:
I disagree with this tbh, goalscoring really isn’t an issue. We scored 64 goals last season which was more than Sheff United and only 5 less than Burnley. The reason they finished on considerably more points than us is simply goals conceded.
Click to expand...
How many did our strikers score?
 

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:39 AM
  • #9,108
Ccfcisparks said:
How many did our strikers score?
Click to expand...
I forgot that only the strikers goals counted.. my bad.
 
Reactions: slyblue57, Skyblueweeman and Skyblue Bangkok

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:40 AM
  • #9,109
Skyblue_CP said:
I forgot that only the strikers goals counted.. my bad.
Click to expand...
Well its their primary role.

Just because Rudoni made up for their poor finishing doesnt mean we should excuse them.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:41 AM
  • #9,110
Matt smith said:
We need a proper number nine

as far as I’m concerned I’d happily let all 3 go or at least 2, they’re not good enough

waiting to see this amazing potential Bassette has to be honest
Click to expand...
Haji is a proper number 9…

Sky Blue Goblin said:
I think a big help to our system would be a striker who is happy to drop into the ten role, to help enable space through the middle.

Think our strikers can all be a bit static, which means we struggle to break sides down at time without resorting to the wings
Click to expand...

One area we struggled last season was that we didn’t have options to change matches from the bench. If Rudoni/Sakamoto/EMC were having off games, there wasn’t any alternatives to switch things up. There isn’t much point in having 3 strikers on the bench when your formation has one striker.

A team as good as ours really shouldn’t have had to rely on Paterson as our only AM/LW cover on the bench.

Leeds and Burnley had Gnotto, Solomon, James, Edwards and Anthony for options. Add in Hamer, Rak-Sakyi, Bereton-Diaz and Brewster for Sheff U. That’s a lot of depth that we just don’t have.
 
Reactions: Fusilier, Hincha, Northeast sky blue and 2 others
P

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:42 AM
  • #9,111
Ccfcisparks said:
Well the retort to people suggesting we upgrade asking "WHO THEN" is equally as moronic.
Click to expand...
I need to join the clever group obviously
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:42 AM
  • #9,112
Perennial Lurker said:
I need to join the clever group obviously
Click to expand...
You do.
 
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:42 AM
  • #9,113
fernandopartridge said:
Our xGA (which you might say is a measure of how many chances we give up) was 52.6 last season, vs 55.9 the season before and 54.7 the 2022/23 play off season. We have two very good centre halfs, a reasonable back up in Lati and somebody in Binks who has lost his way a bit.

It is lower priority imo to addressing our goalscoring problem, especially as goals can have such an impact on the flow of a game. It'd be interesting to see what the game state was when we conceded (i.e. do we concede mostly when level in games)?
Click to expand...

The defence was definitely more of an issue. We were the highest scoring team out of the playoff teams yet the worst in GA. We would've probably scored more if Haji wasn't out for a huge chunk of the season.

In terms of eye test alone the manner in which we conceded goals as well was also on the whole consistently poor.
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 10:51 AM
Reactions: Hincha and shmmeee

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:44 AM
  • #9,114
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Haji is a proper number 9…



One area we struggled last season was that we didn’t have options to change matches from the bench. If Rudoni/Sakamoto/EMC were having off games, there wasn’t any alternatives to switch things up. There isn’t much point in having 3 strikers on the bench when your formation has one striker.

A team as good as ours really shouldn’t have had to rely on Paterson as our only AM/LW cover on the bench.

Leeds and Burnley had Gnotto, Solomon, James, Edwards and Anthony for options. Add in Hamer, Rak-Sakyi, Bereton-Diaz and Brewster for Sheff U. That’s a lot of depth that we just don’t have.
Click to expand...
Do agree on the lack of depth on the wings especially if you don’t include Wright as a left winger but as the starting striker.

It’s a big reason I liked the Belgian Striker link as he can play off the Right or down the centre as a 9 while being happy in possession to drop deeper into midfield.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

Balli001

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:48 AM
  • #9,115
Perennial Lurker said:
I'm not suggesting there isn't but it's the glib manner that some think it's an easy fix
Click to expand...
Unless you are shopping at the top of the game then any player at this level is upgradable
 
Reactions: Perennial Lurker

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:50 AM
  • #9,116
procdoc said:
Not like you to shit the bed
Click to expand...
Are those strikers we’ve got good enough to get us into the premier league then clever clogs

I’m not on about wright either he clearly is
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 11:07 AM

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:50 AM
  • #9,117
Ccfcisparks said:
Well its their primary role.

Just because Rudoni made up for their poor finishing doesnt mean we should excuse them.
Click to expand...
I guess Burnley should be looking to replace Flemming because Brownhill excused him? The same goes for Sheff U and Campbell? (Who Haji outscored having played less games). It’s not a requirement for the CF to score all the goals? As is consistently proven throughout the Championship and Premier league. Haji was in fact our top scorer so I don’t understand your point.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:52 AM
  • #9,118
Skyblue_CP said:
I guess Burnley should be looking to replace Flemming because Brownhill excused him? The same goes for Sheff U and Campbell? (Who Haji outscored having played less games). It’s not a requirement for the CF to score all the goals? As is consistently proven throughout the Championship and Premier league. Haji was in fact our top scorer so I don’t understand your point.
Click to expand...
Yes Id suggest Burnley will be looking better than Flemming for the Premier League
 

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:53 AM
  • #9,119
Ccfcisparks said:
Yes Id suggest Burnley will be looking better than Flemming for the Premier League
Click to expand...
Thank you for avoiding the point.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 10:57 AM
  • #9,120
Skyblue_CP said:
Thank you for avoiding the point.
Click to expand...
I'd like our backup strikers if we insist on Haji playing down the middle to be more competent yes. Unlike you I dont settle for mediocrity. It appears our elite tactician doesnt either which is good.
 
Reactions: Matt smith

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:00 AM
  • #9,121
Ccfcisparks said:
I'd like our backup strikers if we insist on Haji playing down the middle to be more competent yes. Unlike you I dont settle for mediocrity. It appears our elite tactician doesnt either which is good.
Click to expand...
I’d like our back up strikers to be more competent yes. I think mediocre is abit strong. But you weren’t making that point. You said the issue wasn’t the defence it was the forwards. Then it was the strikers weren’t scoring enough. Now it’s back up strikers aren’t good enough. Stay consistent bud.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:05 AM
  • #9,122
Skyblue_CP said:
I’d like our back up strikers to be more competent yes. I think mediocre is abit strong. But you weren’t making that point. You said the issue wasn’t the defence it was the forwards. Then it was the strikers weren’t scoring enough. Now it’s back up strikers aren’t good enough. Stay consistent bud.
Click to expand...
I never mentioned the centre halves.

The strikers are the forwards correct?

I think your reading comprehension seems particularly low. I'm assuming you are one of the posters who wanted Wilson to start the season.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:06 AM
  • #9,123
Balli001 said:
Thats why we have a scouting team. They cover al over the world. Im fairly sure there is an upgrade on Eccles somewhere on the planet
Click to expand...

That could be applied to everyone in our squad though. The complications come with better, cost, availability, right temperament and do they actually want to come.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:07 AM
  • #9,124
Terry_dactyl said:
That’s what I wanted to hear.

Feels to me like we’ve got a lot of transfer business still to do.
Click to expand...
Counting up I believe the club has only 24 over 21 y.o. players even counting Collins & the injured players so there is still room for 1 more player. Amirite?
 
Reactions: Hobo

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:08 AM
  • #9,125
Ccfcisparks said:
I'd like our backup strikers if we insist on Haji playing down the middle to be more competent yes. Unlike you I dont settle for mediocrity. It appears our elite tactician doesnt either which is good.
Click to expand...
Lampard will know we need an improvement at Centre forward it’s so clear to see
 
M

Martw

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:14 AM
  • #9,126
Matt smith said:
Lampard will know we need an improvement at Centre forward it’s so clear to see
Click to expand...
That article in the Daily Mail was clearly sanctioned by the club, it was too detailed surely for it not to be so. It also read like a mutual come and get him / me message from the club and Wright. I also thought it was a very clear message to say Binks and Bidwell can leave and to drum up interest. Now until the end of the window will be interesting and hopefully exciting.
 
Reactions: Batu1969, djr8369 and Matt smith

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:15 AM
  • #9,127
Matt smith said:
Lampard will know we need an improvement at Centre forward it’s so clear to see
Click to expand...

Applies to most teams in fairness. Celtic fans think they are two short and start their season in just over a week and are competing in Europe. I am noi a Celtic fan. But was looking at one of there forums because I know someone who's son plays for them.
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:17 AM
  • #9,128
Martw said:
That article in the Daily Mail was clearly sanctioned by the club, it was too detailed surely for it not to be so. It also read like a mutual come and get him / me message from the club and Wright. I also thought it was a very clear message to say Binks and Bidwell can leave and to drum up interest. Now until the end of the window will be interesting and hopefully exciting.
Click to expand...
I would 100% keep wright I really rate him

The problem is he’s best off the left and I like EMC too.

I’d love to sign a role player right winger and a ST and rotate 5/6 for 3 spots

Sakamoto
New RW

New ST
Simms/BTA

Wright
EMC
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:17 AM
  • #9,129
Matt smith said:
I would 100% keep wright I really rate him

The problem is he’s best off the left and I like EMC too.

I’d love to sign a role player right winger and a ST and rotate 5/6 for 3 spots

Sakamoto
New RW

New ST
Simms/BTA

Wright
EMC
Click to expand...
We are not going to sign 2 players. We will sign a player who can play both St and RW
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and Perennial Lurker

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:18 AM
  • #9,130
KenilworthSkyBlue said:
The defence was definitely more of an issue. We were the highest scoring team out of the playoff teams yet the worst in GA. We would've probably scored more if Haji wasn't out for a huge chunk of the season.

In terms of eye test alone the manner in which we conceded goals as well was also on the whole consistently poor.
Click to expand...

It is not a priority - the defensive record post Lampard could be improved a bit but definitely improved (1.47 goals per game pre Lampard to 1.13 post), and better still it went to 1 per game from Norwich onwards when the Kitching and Thomas partnership was restored.
 

JSL

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:18 AM
  • #9,131
Nobody is coming in for Eccles whilst he is injured
 
Reactions: Hobo

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:19 AM
  • #9,132
JSL said:
Nobody is coming in for Eccles whilst he is injured
Click to expand...
He's out for a month or so, not done his ACL
 
Reactions: ptr

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:20 AM
  • #9,133
Ccfcisparks said:
I never mentioned the centre halves.

The strikers are the forwards correct?

I think your reading comprehension seems particularly low. I'm assuming you are one of the posters who wanted Wilson to start the season.
Click to expand...
Why are you making it personal? it’s a discussion on a football forum, don’t get so flustered about differing opinions . I made the point about the defence being the issue and not goal scoring. You jumped in asking how many the strikers scored. So one would assume you felt goalscoring was an issue not the defence.

When someone makes a valid counter argument to something you’ve said. You seem to turn to insults about people’s intelligence rather than make a balanced response. Odd

For the record, I’m not sure I even commented on the Wilson starting thread?
 
Reactions: PUSBConnor, Lamps, Chris1987 and 5 others

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:22 AM
  • #9,134
Ccfcisparks said:
We are not going to sign 2 players. We will sign a player who can play both St and RW
Click to expand...
Depends who we offload I think.
 
P

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:24 AM
  • #9,135
Matt smith said:
Depends who we offload I think.
Click to expand...
I think we will use the loan market for one of the forward areas
 
Reactions: djr8369 and Matt smith
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 259
  • 260
  • 261
  • 262
  • 263
  • …
  • 270
Next
First Prev 261 of 270 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • LiammmA moment ago
  • Simpson1 minute ago
  • FRANK1 minute ago
  • DACMAC1 minute ago
  • zuni2 minutes ago
  • MalcolmPowder2 minutes ago
  • chiefdave3 minutes ago
  • The Watchmaker pt.23 minutes ago
  • skyblueinswansea4 minutes ago
  • Pusb15 minutes ago
  • SkyBlueJord6 minutes ago
  • Perennial Lurker7 minutes ago
  • SkyBlue_Adam8 minutes ago
  • Ccfc_Addy8 minutes ago
  • Incognitocov9 minutes ago
  • twistandshout11 minutes ago
  • Kubrick12 minutes ago
  • DannyThomas_198112 minutes ago
  • Terry Gibson's perm12 minutes ago
  • OtiumForTheMasses12 minutes ago
  • CovLad9413 minutes ago
  • jas36513 minutes ago
  • Dazmataz13 minutes ago
  • pricey15 minutes ago
  • ... and 4 more.
  • Total: 87 (members: 28, guests: 59)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?