Did we ever get players direct from Chelsea due to Adi Viveash?, I think it was more his knowledge of the youth players that had already moved on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did we ever get players direct from Chelsea due to Adi Viveash?, I think it was more his knowledge of the youth players that had already moved on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jake Clarke salterIan Maatsen?
One hell of a player, Joy to watchIan Maatsen?
Wasn't Swift another one?Yeah it's a complete myth.
Since DK arrived the club has definitely looked at more experienced players which probably wouldn't have generated much, if any, resale value. Worrall and Browne being the most notable names that we know of.
Ian Maatsen?
Maatsen didn't join Chelsea youth until after Viveash had already left.Ian Maatsen?
Milan van Ewijk is attracting serious interest from clubs in the Bundesliga and the Premier League. Among others, #BurnleyFC and #EintrachtFrankfurt are seriously interested in the Dutch right-back.
That Frankfurt link stinks of Bling trying to gain interest in him. They;ve just signed a RB from Leeds who played 30 times for them last year on loan.Hopefully pisses off to Germany. Can't be doing with him going to shite like Burnley and seeing him again next season like Hamer and the Blunts.
I missed it but why do you call King Bling? I'm sure there's a hilarious origin storyThat Frankfurt link stinks of Bling trying to gain interest in him. They;ve just signed a RB from Leeds who played 30 times for them last year on loan.
There isn't.I missed it but why do you call King Bling? I'm sure there's a hilarious origin story
You heard something?I think I said this last week, but I dont believe that guy
No smoke without fire and multiple reputable sources say we're in for him. Hes the only one saying not
And he looks made up
He’s probably the most reliable source in the USA and clearly has links with all the clubs thereI think I said this last week, but I dont believe that guy
No smoke without fire and multiple reputable sources say we're in for him. Hes the only one saying not
And he looks made up
I think I said this last week, but I dont believe that guy
No smoke without fire and multiple reputable sources say we're in for him. Hes the only one saying not
And he looks made up
It won’t be us doneWouldn’t be surprised if that’s us done, maybe the keeper, but we’ve made a squad that finished 5th stronger,
No way Lampard will settle for that, nor should he. Not saying we need major work, but you have to evolve - we are close.Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s us done, maybe the keeper, but we’ve made a squad that finished 5th stronger,
If we bid 5.5 million for a keeper you’d like to think there’s a fair bit to spendNo way Lampard will settle for that, nor should he. Not saying we need major work, but you have to evolve - we are close.
Agree clearly a lot going on behind scenes.If we bid 5.5 million for a keeper you’d like to think there’s a fair bit to spend
But didn’t we just need a LB and cover for MVE, we’ve done that ?No way Lampard will settle for that, nor should he. Not saying we need major work, but you have to evolve - we are close.
Baring in mind we have a good keeper only a few months away from injuryAgree clearly a lot going on behind scenes.
King hated stuff getting leaked - his ego hated it, he’s got his wish, literally silence.
You mean half a season, and its an injury thats taken 9 months to healBaring in mind we have a good keeper only a few months away from injury
Be shocked if he was ready before Xmas - still a lot of unknown with the injury.Baring in mind we have a good keeper only a few months away from injury
Why would we accept £5.2m for MVE? With the sell on clause we wouldn't make much money for such an important player.According to Cov Live, Besiktas had a bid of €6 million rejected by the club for MVE. €6 million Euro is around £5.2 million in sterling ?
Because we need te moneyWhy would we accept £5.2m for MVE? With the sell on clause we wouldn't make much money for such an important player.
Because we need te money
We don’t need the money thankfully the club is run the right way. King isn’t the kind of person to sell at a loss or break even. He will want a strong profit and Lampard wouldn’t have come here if there had been any concerns around spending and adding additional strength.Because we need te money
Not true?This isn’t true.
the model is not that we will only ever buy players with a big sell on value. Just as it isn’t for Brighton who have Milner and Wellbeck.
The model is we will invest predominantly in players we can improve and sell for a profit to fund further investments and we will add experience where it makes sense to improve our chances of promotion.
The big pay day for owners is owning a Prem League team the transfer business in between is just how you try and fund getting there !
If we get to the Prem I expect Doug to try and sell the club at that point.