Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (79 Viewers)

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
We couldnt afford to turn it down so it was a panic sale.

If we knew he was going to go, we should have worked on a replacement from his initial demand to leave.
Hardly a panic sale, it was a very good price for player we paid nowhere near that amount for and allowed us to reinvest into make the squad stronger.
 

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member
We couldnt afford to turn it down so it was a panic sale.

If we knew he was going to go, we should have worked on a replacement from his initial demand to leave.
I disagree that defines it as a panic sale, and very happy to agree to disagree too.

I'd love to live in a perfect world where we can have targets lined up ready to sign on the line before we've confirmed a sale, but i dont believe thats fully realistic.
The sales of Vik and Hamer have completely transformed the club and the squad, and made us more stable than we've been since I can remember. With Northampton matches still in painfully recent memory, I think its a little short sighted to be so disappointed by this particular issue!
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
I disagree that defines it as a panic sale, and very happy to agree to disagree too.

I'd love to live in a perfect world where we can have targets lined up ready to sign on the line before we've confirmed a sale, but i dont believe thats fully realistic.
The sales of Vik and Hamer have completely transformed the club and the squad, and made us more stable than we've been since I can remember. With Northampton matches still in painfully recent memory, I think its a little short sighted to be so disappointed by this particular issue!
Long term I agree its transformed the club. That season though we massively missed a midfielder for most of the year and it essentially put us a year behind not replacing him.
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
Isn't this whole Hamer replacement argument wearing thin by now ?
If it was as easy as finding a player as good as him why didn't we , and why don't other clubs ?
Fact is , as he's proven since , that Gus was and is a level above. Also his ability to play 6/8/10 in any given system isn't something that many modern players can do .
I agree however that expecting Ayari to fill his role was extremely optimistic
 

Chris1987

Well-Known Member
Deciding to accept the 3rd highest offer for a player in club history is not a panic sale, its sensible business acumen. Helped ensure long term stability and squad growth.
We've had some questionable player sales for pennies on the pound before, Hamer wasn't one of them.
It's all part of the mcgraw anti DK agenda
 

SkyBlueBarmy84

Well-Known Member
Prompts an interesting question though: we effectively ‘lost’ a season post-Hamer, with the lack of creativity / drive from midfield, but gained £15m.

Give or take, that £15m - arguably/ultimately - allowed us to bring in: MVE (£3.4m), Rudoni (£5m), Mason Clarke (£4.25m), Saka (£1.2m) and, say, Thomas (£2m).

So, assuming that’s ’the model’, are we all happy effectively ‘burning’ a season after the big sales - assuming that we wait for the right replacements and the longer term trajectory of the club is positive (which is seems to be)?

For me, it’s a resounding yes - but we need to remember that after the next big sale: MVE, Rudoni, Wright etc - that £15m is now, conservatively, worth £30m/£40m, and we’re a better overall team for it.
 

peteCCFC

Well-Known Member
We've got the 2 best right backs in the league, but also the 2 worst goalkeepers. Its a strange one. Let's hope the squad balance is fixed before the end of August, otherwise we've not learnt from last season.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
We've got the 2 best right backs in the league, but also the 2 worst goalkeepers. Its a strange one. Let's hope the squad balance is fixed before the end of August, otherwise we've not learnt from last season.

You think Wilson is the worst keeper in the Championship bar Collins?
 

CovRes

Well-Known Member
Prompts an interesting question though: we effectively ‘lost’ a season post-Hamer, with the lack of creativity / drive from midfield, but gained £15m.

Give or take, that £15m - arguably/ultimately - allowed us to bring in: MVE (£3.4m), Rudoni (£5m), Mason Clarke (£4.25m), Saka (£1.2m) and, say, Thomas (£2m).

So, assuming that’s ’the model’, are we all happy effectively ‘burning’ a season after the big sales - assuming that we wait for the right replacements and the longer term trajectory of the club is positive (which is seems to be)?

For me, it’s a resounding yes - but we need to remember that after the next big sale: MVE, Rudoni, Wright etc - that £15m is now, conservatively, worth £30m/£40m, and we’re a better overall team for it.
Hadn't Milan, Sakamoto and Thomas signed before Hamer left?
 

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
It was obvious to everybody that Hamer and Gyokeres were very likely to leave should we not have beaten Luton, it was hardly a revelation.

This is correct, but the story about them announcing it on the coach leaving Wembley is an urban myth created on this forum. As with most myths the more it is repeated the more people later view it as fact.

The same happened with the stories started on here about Hamer being homesick and holding out to join Feyenoord to be closer to his kid, with some posters insisting as a result we should take a reduced fee to accommodate him.
 

Chicken Mcgraw

Well-Known Member
This is correct, but the story about them announcing it on the coach leaving Wembley is an urban myth created on this forum. As with most myths the more it is repeated the more people later view it as fact.

The same happened with the stories started on here about Hamer being homesick and holding out to join Feyenoord to be closer to his kid, with some posters insisting as a result we should take a reduced fee to accommodate him.

Is it really a myth? @mark82
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top