19/20 Accounts (1 Viewer)

[Grendel]

Did we win on them occasions?

no

 

---

[skybluetony176]

no

A good result from your perspective then. You’re only happy when we’re losing.

 

[robbiekeane]

Also again you’ve asked another question rather than asking one posed of you. Where do ccfc borrow the money from and what are the likely interest rates?

Who are they borrowing from? It’s their own fund isn’t it?

Are you actually going to answer the question? It’s a completely valid one asking what the market rate is for alternative funding?

 

[procdoc]

If only we had appointed Kenny Jackett, we’d be in profit as we’d be in the premier league now

 

[Grendel]

Are you actually going to answer the question? It’s a completely valid one asking what the market rate is for alternative funding?

I have answered it. No one would fund a hedge fund and also the funding was required specifically due to going to st Andrew’s

I’ve now answered it 3 times - why in earth would a company specialising in high interest and high risk investments want external loans?

Thats Like McDonald’s advertising Burger King products

 

[skybluetony176]

I have answered it. No one would fund a hedge fund and also the funding was required specifically due to going to st Andrew’s

I’ve now answered it 3 times - why in earth would a company specialising in high interest and high risk investments want external loans?

Thats Like McDonald’s advertising Burger King products

They wouldn’t be lending to the hedge fund though, they’d be lending to the club.

 

[Grendel]

Agreed.
What I find a bit befuddling from Grendel's stance is that it now reflects pretty much every emotion we were feeling right at the start of Save Our City etc etc after that Southampton cup game and thereon .
The boardroom change ten years ago tbh.
I agree with just about everything he's saying in here , but it's at least five years beyond doing anything about it.
They have done what they do.
We've been rationalised,used in pointless vexacious legal battles,we still run at a loss admittedly ,some player's have been sold to cover the consequences of those moves ( Wilson) and someone else will be to cover At Andrews .
Yet I have come around to the current model we're run on .
Somehow they have come to be in it for the long-term .
I wouldn't say no to a sugar daddy though.

in the end protests never work they make little difference especially to a faceless company like the one that owns us

Sixfields at least had a purpose and had a high chance of success. It did unlock the lease which was always going to threaten the clubs existence

Now though we are at a level where we would under normal circumstances attract some interest from real purchases - not the same old faces or a chancer like Haskell

The real point though is discussions with her are in my view pointless and gives her a legitimacy and a mouthpiece to get out her arguments - like protests this also makes no difference