Search results

If the email says that there is a print at home PDF, wouldn’t you expect it to be there? I’m not sure this is the supporters’ fault.

Yes, “digital wallet only” means on your phone. No other option (unless you physically buy it at the ticket office, I assume).

At time of purchase it did say that it was delayed delivery.

The ticket office has confirmed that it’s a mistake on the email, there will be no print at home option. It’s digital wallet only.

Same here, although there’s no PDF attached for the print at home (despite what it says). Anyone have the same issue?

So you’re saying there is a chance that we will change the price even though they are on sale and people are buying them? That’s never happening.

Sorry, I must have misunderstood. I thought you said: “What will be interesting is to see if we do charge £45 for Birmingham.”

Why do you think it’s in doubt that we would charge £45 for Birmingham? Tickets are already on sale at that price so it isn’t going to change.

Monday.

Definitely, that could be this season’s Blackburn moment. Blackburn might only have been a draw but it also stopped Blackburn pulling away from us. That point (and Blackburn losing 2 points) was critical in the end and put us in the playoffs.

The surprise is that some people are surprised how good he is. You only have to have watched one of the games he’s played against us in the last 5 years to see that he’s one of the best midfielders in the championship. No surprise he’s doing it for us too.

Baggies is currently 3pm. We’ll find out next Thursday if that’s changed (cue next meltdown).

It’s funny how Haji’s added-time winner against Luton this season, from 0-2 down, has been forgotten already. As always, the most recent comeback/late winner is always the best ever. Recency bias at is finest!

Looks like I touched a nerve! Go on, admit you almost enjoyed a 12:30 kickoff, it will do you good. Then the next one will be easier [emoji8]

Yet another sterile 12:30 kickoff today [emoji6]

Thank you, a voice of reason at last!

Pete, as someone who understands the laws of the game, what are your thoughts on the onside/offside debate?

Another one who doesn’t understand the offside law. It rebounds off #20 (he doesn’t deliberately play it) so cannot be playing the striker onside. It is only played on if it is deliberate. So if we all accept that the striker is standing in an offside position, he is not played on, and is thus...

We’re not going to agree on this as you clearly don’t understand the concept of the throw ending the minute it touches another player (it does not have to be a team mate), so you continually saying “can’t be offside from a throw in” is a red herring. Guarantee that VAR rules that out (we’ve...

He hasn’t received the ball from a throw so that is absolutely irrelevant. He has received it an offside position from a rebound so is offside.