Search results

Les Reid ‏@Lesreidpolitics59s Unconfirmed rumours #CCFC creditors' meeting proper hasn't even begun yet with ACL "delay tactics". All sides ARE at least in the building!

yeah it's alot more fun than discussing this yet for some reason I keep alt tabbing out and coming back. Gotta stop it. The AI is pretty decent but a human is always smarter. They give the AI bonus's to compensation. I play on very hard, it's fun at that difficulty and I don't feel the need to...

I thought you were making 2 separate points and that I understood them both. 1 being if they had offered 3 years compensation instead of 1 year while on the face of it that would seem fairer it would in reality just mean they got a smaller percentage in the pound. they would have offered (not...

anyway back to my CIV 5 game about to invade china, thank you for your thoughts and things I'd not considered, be interesting to see how the morning pans out.

Oh sure I completely realise you were just proposing a possible way that the deal could go through and ACL only get 0.5p in the pound. I know you weren't stating that to be fact. However if you were right then absolutely it means Appleton has been misleading, you said it's semantics and spin...

Ok now your confusing me, what 600k difference? with what you said there wouldn't be a 600k difference. Option 1 - accept the cva get 25.9p of the debt they were previously owned + a 1 year compensation for breaking the lease. Option 2 - Reject the CVA, limited gets liquidated, they still get...

meeting at 11 aparantly

I understand all that, I'm not sure why that makes what I said "not quite" If they sign the CVA they are getting what they were owed before 630k you say + 1 years rent, multiplied by 0.259 giveing the 500k or so they are going to get if they sign the cva (afraid I can't find the article with...

While if they do sign it I think this will be the reason I don't really agree with you. They wouldn't have failed in their duty as long as they were doing what they thought was right, As long as they can argue why they made the decision and why they thought it was right for the success of the...

Wow if your first paragraph is correct that would make me very unhappy with Appleton, that would be misleading on an absolutely unbelievable scale. You should sign the CVA because if you don't you'll only get 0.5p in the pound. Oh sorry did I forget to tell you thats the exact same amount of...

To be fair to sky etc the many earlier tiny protests hurt this big protest, many people and the news organisations assumed it would be another small one. Fortunately for us it was fantastic but it's not hard to understand why they didn't come.

I would actually, If you lend your friend £100 and he says he can't afford to ever pay you back even though you see him continue to spend money, but he says don't worry Buddy, I'll buy you a couple of pints and then we are even. Do you take the pints or not? I wouldn't. On the face of it ACL...

Again you aren't reading what I wrote. Both Appleton and fisher say ACL will and should sign the CVA because if they don't they will only get 0.5p in the pound. For ACL to get only 0.5p that means there has to be significantly less money in limited to give them than if they are getting 25.9p, I...

I wrote this in another thread but it was clearly the wrong place trying to discuss it with Grendel. "People are talking like the deal goes through if ACL reject the CVA, I don't see how thats true, Appleton and Fisher have both said ACL get 0.5p in the pound if they reject the CVA, for that to...

I think you completely misunderstood everything I wrote. Your response doesn't go with what I said at all. What the other bidders offered is completely irrelevant to what I was talking about.

People are talking like the deal goes through if ACL reject the CVA, I don't see how thats true, Appleton and Fisher have both said ACL get 0.5p in the pound if they reject the CVA, for that to be true there can't be the money coming in from Otium and so it follows that means Otium have then not...

The only fact you gave was that it's been stated it will only be 3 years till we move in to the new stadium, thats something I don't debunk, that has been stated, unfortunately it's been stated by someone with a huge history of dishonesty and has zero hope of being true. Rotherham who we've...

It's much much more likely that we will lose significantly more quality before the transfer window closes than we will address our strength in depth problem. If you were baker, cristie, clark etc you'd be nuts not to go if an offer was on the table.

reject the cva, I see no hope if they sign, not a great deal more if they don't but I'll roll the dice.

Surely you don't belive most of what you are saying there. It has been stated 3 years by Fisher, there is little to no precedent in this being possible and many many examples of it taking many many years longer, we've already seen that we are months behind compared to what Fisher has already...