Search results

If we're hunting for scapegoats there are another 11 who appeared aside from a Burge, Martin and Stokes who are just as culpable for an inept performance.

Nouble should have buried that chance first half, not sure what happened. Game would have been over then.

Poor performance, poor substitutions. Players showboating. No urgency. Martin and Stokes ridiculous mistakes.

Yes. One badly supported loss making team joining another is a match made in heaven. Were you really a lawyer?

It is optimistic. I'd say about 10k max and that's without the latest excuse (Pressley's damages claim)

Obsessed with Baker. He's gone. Get over it.

They rent from ACL don't they?

The final paragraph was the perfect justification for a Ricoh deal in itself

It's always IF he's owed money. The assumption is that he is but it isn't definite. It should be paid if he is.

You've got to think Mowbray is intent on hanging around. Bangura is a long term signing really.

In fairness the statutory demand against them from Higgs failed

What's so special about the cheesemakers?

Cheers Vic. We don't know that he is actually owed that much, it's a claim at the moment that appears to be disputed. If it is shown that he is owed 18 months pay then yes it should certainly be paid. I suspect both parties will settle somewhere in the middle though.

It'll be an employment tribunal won't it?

Why was the story commissioned? I suspect it was commissioned with the headline in mind (because that's what your readers want to hear as much as it may be true)

That's what happens when the main function of the website is advertising

isn't it: "let he without sin shall cast the first stone"?

Seriously, pay the man his due. Another very naive contract negotiation by the sounds of it.

Christ, we've appeared at more courts than most hardened criminals

Indeed. Haynes now has to earn a place ahead of Stokes. It isn't necessarily a bad thing, Haynes form was so poor that he had potential to lose all of his confidence.