Search results

Oxlade Chamberlain went to Arsenal following a season in league one for £12 rising to £15M. I guess that's a good indicator of market value.

At the end of the day on this occasion it's going to give some extra time for those who got injured on Saturday to recover, god knows we all know that Reda could benefit from the rest too and TM said in the CWR Crewe post match interview that Chris Stokes has been playing with a slight injury...

That's enough about SISU's priorities. Why are we playing on Monday?

I think you're pretty much right there. We've also got some of what are supposed to be the more difficult games out the way. Looking forward to a good, positive and enjoyable performance on Monday and a result to match would be nice.

I'm not talking about our original dressing room I'm talking about the one that was built for us after they took over, which I'm sure you understood. Still, ignoring the point I was making for a cheap dig at the wasps was always going to get you a like.

I think anyone who's ever been to a football match could see Wilson was going to do well in the championship and possibly even the premier league. There was no gamble for Bournemouth at £3M. They were always going to get at least £3M worth of player. We unfortunately sold a player I would was...

Don't we have our own dressing room? Can we not decorate that how we see fit. It was suggested on here long before TM picked up on it or possibly even before he arrived at the club that the club could get some free standing display boards with CCFC related pictures and stuff on for the tunnel...

He was not sold for market value. He was sold for the best of the low offers we received for him. There is a difference. You only have to look at the history of players being sold from this league to higher leagues before the Wilson deal to see we didn't get market value for him. Oxlade...

Completely misses the point that he clearly wasn't sold for market value and people were complaining about this at the time of the sale. I find it hard to understand why people can't just say yes, with the benefit of hindsight we did sell him on the cheap. There's no shame in that, it's the...

Still dodging the question I see. You're clearly never going to answer it because if you answer it honestly you know it blows your "argument" out the window and fair play to you, you clearly don't want to tell a bare faced lie so you're just dodging the question instead. I see a career in...

So Lucas turned down SISU's bid for the leasehold? Is that what you're saying? What was that bid again? I say again like you've already told us. Which of course you haven't as you keep dodging the question.

We weren't there for the losses off a company we'd put into admin and you know that so I don't know why you pretend we were. You're only fooling yourself with that one. Well, you and FP. Although Sickboy will probably turn up in a minute to join in.

They're irrelevant to the fact that the Wilson money was used to cover the losses from Sixfields which was the point I was making. The losses Grendull is talking about are from CCFC Ltd. The loses from Sixfields were incurred by OE.

Here's the other thing. Because the Wilson money was used to cover the losses from Sixfields that SISU's investors were going to cover not only did we lose our best player we never used any of the Wilson money to replace him. As a result of which we came very close to getting relegated. Again...

If he keeps playing like he did today he'll have 10 by Xmas.

What's that got to do with the losses incurred from the idiotic move to Northampton? Weren't we told that SISU's investors would cover the Sixfields losses? Presumably they meant after the family jewels have been sold off.

I would be surprised if no one is looking at him either last season or this. The big difference between us and Bournemouth being of course is that Bournemouth don't have the smell of a club who's owners would sell the crown jewels at the whiff of money. All bids we received for Wilson IMO were...

Financial losses caused by the idiotic move to Northampton. Still it saved SISU's investors £3M to cover the losses so I guess that's why you consider it a good deal.

So they got £15M for him of the back of league one performances then if I understand that correctly. Again makes Wilson look cheap.

I'd at least put him on par with Walcott. A similar style of player but Wilson is stronger. How many league goals had Walcott scored by the time he was Wilson's age? I have a feeling Wilson has scored more and I'm willing to bet that by the time he reaches Walcott's age he'll score more in the...