Search results

It was the council who overcharged the rates IIRC as they're the outfit that you pay rates to, not your landlord. And yes again IIRC the club were successful in their appeal and rightly so.

Forgetting your lunch is always awesome.

Think the pirates code in pirates of the Caribbean and you won't be far off ;)

They're guidelines not rules.

Isle of Man I believe.

Nice crusty roll, cheese, onion and ready salted crisps (inside the roll to) and a steaming cup of coffee. Nothing better.

I'm going to predict a European replay.

I'm not saying there would be no benefit but hundreds of job's. No way. I bet the Ricoh doesn't employ hundreds and what SISU have proposed so far isn't going to offer anything like what the Ricoh is going to offer. Plus the majority of the jobs that JLR are bringing are full time jobs as would...

Well you clearly know more than me. Obviously there were CCC employees on ACL's board but as far as I'm aware the bills were paid by ACL so therefore they were employed by ACL not CCC as you claimed. But like I say, you clearly know more than me.

Not the hundreds and thousands that JLR are creating and Aston Martin would have created ,no. And for the jobs created at the new stadium it's quite possibly a similar number are going to be lost at the Ricoh due to the loss of dates taken up by the club. So the net gain in jobs is going to be...

Wasn't it ACL who employed Webber Shandwicks Services?

Problem is Nick Jaguar and Aston Martin for that matter were bringing something to the table. Namely jobs and unlike calling hedge funds bluffs chasing the development of jobs in the community is the councils job. If you really can't see the difference there's no helping you.

The site sounds ideal to me. I just don't see it the job of a local government to be calling people's bluff. If SISU are serious it's a good prospect. They spent time chasing Rugby Council perhaps it's time to start chasing CCC. As well as it not being CCC's job to call bluffs it's also not...

Why don't SISU call the council and call their bluff? After all it wasn't that long ago the council were pointing out that they can't (despite what some people were claiming) turn down a planning application on the basis of it being SISU who are the applicant. Plus if it's already been offered...

They all got re-elected and no one got sacked. Unlike our owners it doesn't look like they need the PR. Do you really think it's the job of local government to be playing games by calling bluffs of a hedge fund who no one believes anyway?

Surely if the club isn't calling the council the bluff has already been called? Do you really think it's the job of a local authority to play silly buggers calling bluffs? I don't, I'm sure they have some real work to be getting on with without the distraction of playing childish games with an...

Quick question. Why can't the club ring the council?

Sick? Definitely me. Each to there own and I'd defend any man's rights to dress as a woman, have a sex change etc and admire their bravery but there's still something about it that I find a little creepy and funny at the same time. I think its just because they're not fooling anyone.

Didn't the Portuguese detective handling the case write a book after he retired accusing them of killing her and hiding the body with the abduction being made up to cover their tracks? Something they deny and counter claimed that the detective saw a high profile case just before his retirement...

I'm sure the state aid police (AKA SISU) are all over it already ;)