Search results

I answered the question. I'm just waiting for your manifesto so I can't start campaigning for you.

I've just confirmed I'm voting Grendull. How much on topic do you want it.

You tell me. You're the one with the aspirations to be the top dog.

That's why we need you in there. To mix it up a little. If you stand I'll vote for you. Can't say fairer than that.

Well, I've at least given you the pleasure of being able to address me by my own name. I'm guessing your name isn't Cuthbert Cecil Farquhar Carruthers.

Is this some of the "professionalism" that you're going to bring to the Sky Blue Trust when you're running it?

Never said I was, also never started a thread from an anonymous account stating what anonymous me would do if I was in the public eye. Which of course he never will be.

For it to be ironic grendull would have to step out from behind his keyboard, join the trust if he isn't already a member and make inroad's into getting to the top publicly exposing who he is in the process. I'd love to see it happen and I'd be the first to say fair play to him if he did but...

Focus on what's good for the club? You don't even want fans asking for costed business plans of renting the Ricoh vs redevelopment of the BPA in a joint venture with CRFC so that's bullshit for starters.

The rest of us don't. Stick with being a keyboard warrior. Play to your strengths.

If you were head of the trust you'd have to step out from the anonymity of your keyboard. Never going to happen.

I must have made a point because you're pretending to be stupid on a throw away not to be taken literally comment added on at the end.

Not what I meant and you know that.

No. I've repeatedly said for a long long time we need both. Which is why when CA came out and practically said the same a while back I was all smug about it. Never said anything different. Sorry if I've not made that clear on this particular thread but that has always been my stance.

Attend what? It needs a costs business plan before anything can happen? Why you keep trying to get me to say I won't go is beyond me. Other than you can't attack the point so you're attacking the man making it. Maybe you just don't want to know if it would be done with the clubs best interests...

Rental? Cost of running day to day? It's not as simple as saying we'll have 100% of match day revenue and 50% of other revenue. We'll also have 100% of match day costs and 50% of all other day to day running costs. Also while limiting our ticket revenue capacity. That's also before you factor in...

What doomsday scenario? I've asked questions not stated a scenario. I'm well aware that I know as much as you. I keep pointing this out you. You're queuing up at the Butts to get in and you have absolutely no idea of what A) it means for the club and B) if it's the best option for the club. All...

How much is it going to generate? What will the split of that turnover and profit be between CCFC and CRFC? It's not just about the profits what about the costs? The cost of redevelopment for starters, what debt will that load onto the club? How much will that cost us a year? How many years will...

Legally would that even be possible? Wouldn't that be classed as illegal state aid?

TBF if JS is now backtracking martcov may well have had a point when mocking him.