Search results

We have two years left to run on our current deal. It's too early yet to know what the situation will be at the time it comes to make a decision. Alot can and will happen over the the next couple of seasons. Absolutely he shouldn't have answered the question. A reaction should have been obvious...

"Asked if the club may again have to find another home ground because of these factors - after a groundshare with Northampton in the 2013-14 season - Mr Anderson said: "Possibly, but it's too early to tell." Nobody should be encouraging this type of language from the club. If CA is too stupid...

Straight on the defensive for them. Surprise surprise. Not. It was a stupid reply considering our history and he should have just brushed the question aside so a reply couldn't have been picked up on. All he's done is change the focus for the fan base. That's either incompetence or deliberate.

You would think that they learned from last time that threatening to take the ball away isn't the way to do it and actually doing it even less so. Problem is that with SISU's history of doing the same things expecting different results you wouldn't put this past them. This is a worrying...

The BBC have quoted CA saying it also http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-36964166 Silly bugger games have begun.

No. We'd have gone into admin, actually shed a load of debt and got an owner who didn't buy us because of distress debt. Let's not try and pedal the SISU saved us line.

I think he means the lack of due diligence. Which is indeed terrible business.

Well, that's a pisser.

Be nice to have him back. Can't see Newcastle sending him to a rival championship club so we have half a chance if he does go out on loan.

I suppose with all the nonsense you spout you'll have to be right sooner or later.

Which is pretty much what you said they'd done. In stark contrast to how our lot went about it.

If the thread is doing well given all the variables and looking at similar threads before we estimate that there could be as many as 6000 posts (said while nervously twiddling a pen thinking is my boss really about to make me say this, shit I've started now I'm going to have to finish, it's...

Probably because they've been clever enough to not say who they're talking to. The brains of our bunch kept setting themselves up for a fall on that one insisting that they were talking to councils, environment agency and highways agency claiming that you were doing impact statement's etc when...

Just been looking and you can make a complaint about an approved planning application to the local government ombudsman as a third party but only about the administration, not the decision itself. JR3 here we come unless by some miracle it gets rejected.

Can I just say that my avatar is in no way promoting child labour. My children are not working on the buses.

Shame. It would be nice to resolve something without going to a judicial review. Not that going to a judicial review has resolved anything yet.

Perhaps if we successfully maintain our academy at the AEHC we could allow wasps ro use some of the facilities in exchange for a favorable rental agreement at the Ricoh with more access to revenue.

Much better. Concentrates for the most part on the green belt angle and the special consideration for the academy. Am I right in saying that the kicking barn will take over existing green space? If so surely that's a further erosion of green belt and in dispute with the original planning...

Send anyone but TF. Don't get Mowbray involved either.

No one's going to gift us an academy. We're still going to be reliant on others. Others who probably don't have a vested interest in the city of Coventry. Unless there's a city in the Cayman islands named after Coventry.