Search results

You've just spent god knows how many pages selling the line that it's all CSF's fault for not replying to a letter while trying to come up with a conspiracy theory when in actual fact all CA had to do to get answers was to go to a prearranged meeting that HE himself cancelled. You're doing more...

Again, changing the subject. Why are you doing CA's PR?

That's sharing a view. If you don't agree with it go and watch Wasps. It's up to you. Again, good effort on changing the subject. CA will be double proud of you now.

Not heard anything of a Wasps boycott. Who's organized that? I am and always will boycott Wasps but that's a personal decision I made on day one though based on my own moral guidelines. Not based on some PR I read somewhere. Good effort in changing the subject though. I'm sure CA appreciates...

Yep. It's everyone else's responsibility except CA's. No ones falling for it this time though. Well, except Nick.

The trust did their job by researching what is needed, where it can be located and how flexible the rules are. There's every chance that CA's list is an exact list of requirements that we don't currently have under the current arrangement and don't need to be all on the one site. Truth is CSF...

You've fallen for it because you've repeatedly said that the CSF should reply in writing to call CA bluff when you should be asking why didn't CA attend the meeting and call CSF's bluff. You're accusing them of a double dealing PR stunt so why didn't CA attend and expose it? Obvious answer is he...

Do you not think that this is the same game playing by those at the top who denied that ACL made an offer, ACL then confirming that the offer was made through the FL and then for those at the top to then say that no "direct" offer had been made. It's the same bullshit, denial, game playing we've...

You have had a media/pr job done on you. CA seems to have convinced you that the academy is everyone else's responsibility and he's exonerated from blame because he didn't get a reply to a letter on things that were to be discussed at a meeting he wouldn't attend. The rest of us can see it for...

I really don't think its the money that's the issue for our owners. It's the involvement. There time and energy is better off from their perspective in other investments. Hence the streamlining. They have less overheads and less investment in every meaning of the word in a failed project that...

No worse than your computer one ;)

I wouldn't blame them on the latter as I'm 43. But I might play the victim anyway.

Would we need all the staff we need now? I doubt it. There's another overhead cut in terms of money and time and effort. Would we need to find all the facilities we need to find now? Again I doubt it. So yet again more savings in time, effort and money. We would save much more than £200k going...

I've checked eBay and amazon and there's no facilities to run a cat 2 academy on either. Oh well, I'll just have to get off my arse and go and see people who do have those facilities.

You're assuming though that local boys like Wilson and Maddison wouldn't have come through the academy if we didn't have Cat 2 status. That's the unknown quantity here and it's becoming very apparent that that is a gamble SISU are willing to take in making the club as streamline and less time...

Hey Nick. My lawnmower has just gone up the swanny. Should I email B & Q my list of requirements and if they don't email me back should I A) sit around moping say woe me woe me while the grass grows under my feet? Or B) grow the fuck up, get of my arse and provocatively go out and buy a new...

Ask Chris Anderson. The academy is his responsibility but yet he's reluctant to go and talk to the people HE needs to go and talk to about it. Odd behaviour for someone who is apparently doing all he can to save it wouldn't you agree?

Because they are going through a legal process. Did I really have to just point that out for you? When there's agreements made between CCFC and CSF/Wasps then yes everything should be in writing and binding. Until that point face to face is fine. Unless of course you have no interest in...

Because it's the planners job to do that. Same as it's Andersons job to do everything he can to save the the academy. Assuming that he wants to save the academy of course.

Not could have gone to the meeting. Should have gone to the meeting. Why are you defending him for actively not persueing every course of action to help secure the future of the academy? As has been pointed out the sum of what he's done is send a letter, woe me'd alot, spat his dummy out and not...