Search results

It would be more appropriate to compare us to Sheffield United than it would to compare us to the clubs who are responsible for the vast majority of the £1B. Who's comparing us to those clubs like you claim? No one I know and no one I can remember seeing post on here. It's something that you've...

Again. No one's looking at Man City and the other team's in the premier league that have contributed most to the £1B. You also seem to forgetting that we're in league one by indicating that this is what people are doing. Most people (if not all) are comparing us to teams like Bradford and...

Isn't the lad from Newcastle supposed to be 6ft, a unit and uses it?

It's going to happen then is it? Like Italia said, wasps will offer us something temporary and like Stu said, that's why I'm not panicking. You seemed to have taken a completely hypothetical conversation about something that hasn't and won't happen, taken it as gospel that it will happen and...

So you're not going to explain it then. That does surprise me.

If it was liquidated that would be SISU's choice. As has been pointed out we'd still have players under contract to sell, the FL have no power to wind up a club. It wouldn't be the end of the club unless our owners volunteered it.

Grendull is about to explain that.

I thought that Rytons mortgage was paid of and it's now held as a charge by Soncap/Arvo against the club? Don't SISU own all the rights to name, image etc. so as our owners if they chose to start again they'd still be our owners, we'd still be CCFC aka The Sky Blues. Of course if they chose...

Apply to join a league in the lower pyramid, sign players and if nothing else we can play at Ryton, that we'd still own.

That doesn't close the club though. It just kicks it out of the league. Something that the FL could do within the rules that the club have signed up to as members.

The council haven't blocked anything though and in reality can't. Before you get there the lease has to change hands, then an application has to go in for redevelopment and changing of the covenant and even then there's an appeal process that involves central government and that's before you...

Surely SISU would have to prove that there's no viable option acceptable to the FL, flying in the face of what they've been telling/selling the FL for 3+ years. The boy that cried wolf once again spring's to mind. I suspect they've claimed to much on the record already to be taken serious enough...

That's why I said if we leave on our own accord. I was deliberately making the distinction.

How would the FL close the club?

If that's the case perhaps you can stop telling people that SISU aren't the club and what SISU do doesn't effect the club. You clearly don't believe it.

So on what basis could SISU take them to court then?

All hail SISU and their litigation history. The only history we've witnessed personally is failure. Are you sure that the FL would be concerned? Especially given the large number of false dawns that they've fed the FL (and us) over the last few years? I think SISU would have a hard time...

They'd be better of gambling on a double promotion than any legal case that might never even reach court I would think. Given their track record on winning court case's. Mind you their track record on winning promotion is no better. Probably best that they just don't gamble.

I think you're making a valid point that many are missing. The door was always open at the Ricoh before Wasps owned it so the £1M wasn't a gamble, it was safe. If we leave of our own accord again there's zero guarantee that any door will be left open at the Ricoh, there is no guarantee of that...

Unattached. He can be signed outside of the window if needs be.