Search results

Surely this article dismisses some of the posturing? Shouldn't you be welcoming it in that case? Who should the digging at the BPA be aimed at?

It's not a site then is it? A site is a plot of land suitable for development. How do you find out if it's suitable? it goes further than going "oh yeah, that looks to be about the X amount of acre's we need, let's tell everyone we've identified a site". It's BS unless there's a chance of it...

It would be pretty hard to identify a site if they haven't. Otherwise all you've done is identify a field. The only way you could classify it as a site is if you've been talking to the relevant local authorities to gauge the possibility of it becoming a site. The FOI's confirm that hasn't...

Did you go to the march?

It's not the article that's whipping up the storm it's the point's being made in it. The point's being made are the FOI responses that were made because of recent comments made by TF. So what's whipping up a storm? The CT or the responses from FOI's on TF's comments? The latter I would say. But...

Every post you make is click bait. What do you want digging into with the BPA situation? They've asked CCC if any contact has been made over developing a stadium, there hasn't. TF claims it's stalled over a political embargo. What political embargo? There would have to be something to block for...

So you don't think Fisher lies about everything? Just like anyone else you don't know what's BS and what isn't. Unlike everyone else though you use the line against people who use his quotes when it suit's you and then claim other people only believe him when suit's. You're no different. You...

Perhaps LR could do it?

SG isn't the sports correspondent.

That's a reflection of a very pissed of fan base. Not CT coverage.

You have no interest in engaging with anybody really past trolling your own fans forum. You constantly accuse the CT of producing click bait. I can't see how your posts are any different really. You and SG are two peas from the same pod in that respect.

And now he doesn't lie because it suit's.

Only when suit's. And on this occasion it suit's you.

CCC are on the list. Not much digging to do if no planning application has gone in is there?

Who's said it's all SISU's fault? People had a problem with SISU's lack of enthusiasm with for saving the academy. Was that wrong? Should we have accepted them rolling over regarding the academy and done it the Neville Chamberlain way?

How many times have you fell over yourself to correct the things SISU have made up?

Nicks head of the protest group doing it the Neville Chamberlain way. Have you not heard about all the action they're taking against SISU?

I never questioned if you believed it or not I questioned the amount of time and effort you spend questioning them. You've so far promoted 5 pages on a nothing story about a nothing story that does nothing negative directly to the club. I'm questioning your priorities.

Spend as much time pointing out the things SISU have made up then. You have a bigger pool to fish in and unlike the stuff that the CT make up what SISU make up directly has a negative effect on CCFC from source.

Going to have to think of a harder question. If it takes Simon Gilbert an hour to shape his Lego hair how many Tim Fishers does it take to build a stadium?