Search results

What did we try to negotiate after we were invited to and AL went to see JS on the train? Who's fault is that. We were never going to get offered a deal that was negotiated under a confidentiality agreement. Why you keep perusing this line of nonsense is beyond me.

How many times have you said that? Shop in the concourse for instance. Never happen according to you. There may well be a main tenant but it's their tenant (CCFC) who can bring the main exposure and increase the potential revenue from that. This is what's happened with West Ham. They dont get...

Oh dear. Can't argue the point so start attacking the man. Have you ever accused SISU of whipping things up? After all it is a reaction to there actions. Try putting the horse before the cart for a change. I've made lot's of good suggestions on how to protest against Wasps and what over and...

I think there's the chance that we could buy the right's to revenue streams, even a share of the naming rights. If not a share of ACL itself. New owners should be looking at the West Ham/Olympic stadium model and try and emulate that. Two things stopping that at the moment. 1) No one want's to...

But that isn't what's damaging CCFC. I think you're being very disingenuous by pretending that this is an action caused by the actions of the CT, because it isn't. It's caused by the actions of our owners and those that they put in charge of our club. I'm sure that the the various supporter...

I don't think we even need CRFC's permission to put an application in. Sure someone has made that point before on here before. Obviously it would be wise to do it as a joint application but i don't think it's a requirement.

Not naive at all. My emotional response isn't a response to articles in the CT it's a response to what I've witnessed first hand. You naively seem to be saying that his reporting of the damage being done to the club is damaging the club. It isn't. It's a response to the damage being done to the...

But all he is doing is reporting on what our owners are or aren't doing. He's not making them do or not do something. He's reporting on an emotion that is already there within the fan base, he's not saying feel this way or the other. The feelings are already there and a response to the action...

It's even more futile than asking SISU to put the club up for sale and SISU putting the club up for sale is most likely going to happen at some point. The only place Wasps will go if they leave the Ricoh is to the wall.

It's a fair question. People like LAST and BHSB moan about SISU a lot on here but then to be fair to them they also go out and help organise things, attend meetings, put sky blue ribbons up everywhere etc. etc. They don't sit behind a keyboard moaning about it on a faceless forum (like me ;) )...

No. But then I'm not the one saying it was or wasn't this big. Did you stand somewhere and watch them walk by from start to finish so you can have the slightest of chance of verifying your claim on how big the attendance isn't? Just asking.

To be fair I would back it so long as the message is right. i.e.about securing the academy and securing our future at the Ricoh beyond the end of next season. If it's Buzz of Franchise London Rugby Club back to where you came from (Wycombe) then forget it.

I've previously suggested that if Wasps won't get back around the table we should do something like a very very slow rolling road block around the Ricoh area/A444 to delay/stop Wasps fans getting in the game. Would be especially effective if it was a televised game as it might get some live TV...

He's agreed the sale of the leasehold to John Sharp. Once completed (assuming it isn't already) how would he still be in the picture? The FOI's have proved things though. A) there is no site, for the reasons we've already discussed. B) There has been no approach involving the club at the BPA so...

Chris Millerchip. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-ground-share-coventry-11915196 out of the picture I would think. John Sharp. Gone quite. Yes could do with pushing. Not sure what he could say about the ground share with CCFC without a joint statement though...

Yes yes yes. We got digging. Care to expand.

Digging. Yes we got digging. Then you start waffling on about other stuff we weren't talking about. So back to the BPA. What digging do you see being required? What questions should be asked? Who should be asking those questions? Who should be answering those questions? Please don't say digging...

So what do you expect them to be doing?

Where did you see it from? Did you stand somewhere and watch them walk by from start to finish?

Well they've asked CCC, no approach been made. CRFC have gone quite. The club aren't talking to the CT. Where should the digging be made exactly? Who are they going to ask and what are they going to ask them? And where the club are concerned who's going to ask them?