Search results

And then when you question it accuse you of having a bad day like there must be some truth in what he said. Didn't even take three weeks this time for the cards to start come crashing down.

Yeah but Tims investors came through and paid for the desk. You can't argue with that ;)

I think it's hard to argue with that.

Why ask me? Tim is the one who says investors lined up not me. Brylowes has asked why you need investors if you're renting. Also a valid question. Every time Tim opens his mouth the picture gets foggier and if it's about the BPA JS seems to have to make a statement the next day for some clarity...

When did he say that Dave?

Good offer. Well done the club.

I would make the comment that this means there's little stopping us and CRFC putting these plans in that people are insisting are around and start getting on with it but having read the statement released today from CRFC it seems that there isn't even an agreement in place in principle between...

Side step, shuffle shuffle shuffle, side step. Seriously though that could be interpreted as drop the legal action. Not saying that is what he means but it could be taken that way.

Nothing at this stage. It's one of several options he is looking at that's all. He will either decide there is something in it for CRFC and pursue this line or decide there isn't and not pursue it in which case there will never be anything in it for him. Not where the BPA and CCFC are concerned.

"any costs associated with the project would not be borne by CRL or BPAL" This for starters and then you have the build cost on top of that. Hows that going to be funded? Where's the split in sharing that cost? Where is our share going to come from? Tim says his has the investors in place are...

Just reading back this quote again and if understand it correctly it seems Tim has the finances in place, depending who you want to believe there are plans in place for anything between 12-25k stadium but what doesn't seem to be in place is any such agreement with CRL/BPAL of a way forward. That...

So long as he doesn't ask for proof of funds with traceability all the way through like SISU want with anyone interested in CCFC.

"One of the several options at the study stage is having the Sky Blues as tenants here. We have stated in writing that there would be a number of conditions to this, designed to protect Coventry Rugby’s interests, before it could be realised:- any costs associated with the project would not be...

Might be worth reading this before making your mind up Statement from Jon Sharp – Coventry Rugby

On board with what? There's nothing to get on board with until an official approach is made. Has that happened? The fact that they're telling us that they have plans drawn and finances in place but aren't acting on them what does that tell you? Why would you spend money and time doing that...

Then nothing is stopping them getting the planning process started is there? Why haven't they? It seems they could have the minute JS took control of the BPA. Why haven't they?

Well then there's even less excuses for TF, JS and anyone else involved to not get the ball rolling is there. The finance's are in place we're told, plans have been drawn we're told and apparently there is no conditions in place to stop us playing at the site. What's stopping them getting the...

Once the process had been started. If TF sits around waiting for the council to hold his hand then nothing is going to happen is it. Maybe that's the plan anyway. They apparently have the finances in place, they apparently have various designs in place, why haven't they started the ball rolling...

It's a historical condition that Chris Millerchip had imposed when CRFC first took over the site to protect it against development. Does the condition still stand since the rights were transferred to JS is the real question. My understanding is that the condition is attached to the site not the...

It would probably help if the club submitted an application thus formalising the process at which point the planning office is bound by law to assist. As always Dave you have to put the horse before the cart.