Search results

I’ve added a ? for your benefit.

I started it because A) he’s available B) he’s experienced and C) he’s from Coventry. I’m aware of his conviction but that wasn’t the angle I was coming from.

I was asking a question. You can see the difference between a question and a statement I’m sure. Then again...

I see Luke McCormick is leaving Plymouth. Anyone fancy him here?Decent league 1/2 goalie with bags of experience. Missed most of this season through injury though so that would be a worry given his age. Only 34 I know but a shoulder injury that needed operating on can be a worry for a goalie.

Personally I’d like to see both start with Biamou playing just behind JCH and McNaulty in a sort of Paul Scholes type roll. Don’t know if it would work but got a chance. With JCH and Biamou on they’d run defences ragged and pull them all over the place.

In no particular order Grimmer Doyle McNaulty

Super snigger.

Are you trying to create an argument to deflect from the main subject matter being discussed here? I would respectfully suggest that you start a new thread on the topic rather than distract from the matter in hand.

Snigger.

Terry made a measured reply to me which I replied to with a couple of articles pointing out that Spurs aren’t getting it all their own way, which they aren’t. You then wade in without engaging your brain so you’re the one creating the argument. Terry has since made another post which I’ve liked...

You’re first point only confirms what I’ve been saying. The last deal that collapsed was for £6M a year so yes of course someone would sponsor it for £10k a year. I said in the post you were replying to that stadium sponsorship will continue just not at amounts previously seen. If you try...

No it isn’t. 5 years the Olympic stadium has been trying to attract a sponsor, each time a deal has collapsed before completion and the next potential sponsor has devalued the deal from the previous one. FACT! Spurs are struggling to find a sponsor who will meet their valuation. FACT! Real...

Which is an article full of estimates, guess work, supposition,what ifs, what buts and maybes. The headline tells you that on it’s own as Man U don’t offer the opportunity for stadium sponsorship. Meanwhile if you live in the real world it’s a different reality. Take Real Madrid for instance...

Which they won’t get, which proves my point. The Olympic stadium has been trying to get a sponsor for over five years now with Vodafone being the latest to pull out of a measly £6M a year deal. Full time premier league club and world famous atheletic venue.

Don’t think spurs are having it all their own way either New Spurs ground could be named the ‘Tottenham Hotspur Stadium’ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/new-spurs-stadium-daniel-levy-14342666.amp

Personally I think the stadium sponsorship bubble has burst. The London Olympic stadium still doesn’t have a sponsor. They’ve come close a few times but the deal has always collapsed with the next potential sponsor coming in and starting at a much lower point than the previous potential sponsor...

I’ve just told you I do you fucking idiot. Nice to see you didn’t let me down when I told you to toddle off and make out I’ve said something I haven’t. That makes you my bitch.

Duffer, unlike you, has made a point. I don’t disagree with what he has said but don’t see it as a reason for the council to run for the bunkers if Wasps go tits up. The two are not connected in the sense that if Wasps do go tits up the council will all of a sudden revisit something that was...

Why do you constantly try putting words in people’s mouths? I haven’t said any of those things or anything remotely like it. If you have a point to make make it instead of talking bollocks and being a twat.

Just pointing out that their only connection to the Ricoh after it was sold was the loan. That’s gone. Given that it’s gone why would they need to be heading to nuclear bunkers? They’re not in a situation where the taxpayer isn’t going to get their money back left high and dry, such as...