Search results

Only just? I first made the point about UK law propping up EU law almost 24 hours ago. I first used the word backbone almost 4 hours ago. Further proof again that you read nothing. What “blatant lies” have I told?

You do know other countries view the EU as a single trading block? It’s one of the major arguments for Brexit from the leave campaign. We want to take back control and all that. When India does a trade deal with the EU no member states will be exempt from that deal. It will be a single deal for...

I actually said backbone not law itself. But then we already know you don’t read anything. It was who said it I was interested in, I never denied it had been made. Just don’t recall it and was interested who said it. I also made the point earlier in the thread (again, no surprise you missed it)...

I compared as a trading block. Which it is. It isn’t a continent, which is what you described it as.

Oh, it’s a quote. Funny you didn’t add a link.

It’s the backbone of current U.K. law on all areas.

Ha ha. Pretending to be thick. As opposed to actually being thick? Tell me again how the EU is a continent.

So again where’s your proof they would abandon it. They want to better it is what they’re saying. Unless you want to worsen it there’s no logic in not adopting initially and using that as a base to start from. If you want to lose some of people’s rights abandon it and start again from the very...

There’s that many directions you could throw mud from I must admit I struggle to keep up. Besides you’d only accuse me of only seeing the bad in everything if I did. Oh wait...

Snigger. That’s your “all”. Can they even muster a councillor amongst them. Comedy gold. Anyway, I’ll amuse you. Where have “all” of them backed an abandonment of the charter and it being dropped from post brexit British law?

Further proof you don’t read anything.

Says who? You. If you’re not talking about Labour anyway you’re not talking about all parties who have an ideology based on increased workers rights. In fact you’re leaving the main party with those principles out so you’re diluting you’re own point before you even start.

Labour tried to block the abandonment of the charter by the government. Leaving the EU doesn’t require the abandonment of any EU legislation. In fact the repeal bill sets out to transfer EU legislation into U.K. legislation. Them two points make your question irrelevant and a distraction from...

I don’t need to lend a mirror but if you need one just ask. I’m more than happy to lend you one.

We want something bespoke but we don’t want to cherry pick is a contradiction in terms. Unless you want something completely opposite to EU law in which case we’re heading for human rights policies something more akin to Saudi Arabia. I would think even you’d struggle to argue that wouldn’t be a...

You’re argument is completely moronic. If we’re not going to lose anything you adopt all areas of EU law. If you want to improve something you still do that and then use this as your starting point if for no other reason than economics. This is the cheapest way of doing it. If you don’t want to...

You tell me. You apparently agree with me. Well, at least in the post I was replying to you do. Although you have contradicted yourself with the whole no cherry picking/we need something bespoke argument you’ve been having. Mainly with yourself.

If I ran a fracking business I’d love a lowering of environmental standards. Wouldn’t you? ;)

Because our government is rejecting parts of it. With your blessing. You do know what cherry picking means don’t you?

You’re advocating cherry picking with every post.