Search results

Not really no... Because we are talking about the financial security and long term future of our football club. So that's not good enough in my opinion.

You don't need me for that.... CET have that covered.

I'm not trying to completely blame the Council for all of this... What I am proposing is that they took a course of action, and it's not unreasonable for us to know the reasons why. Why did they do the deal with the council for £14m. They knew (and said as much) that it would cause huge tension...

I think that does sum up two of the key factors. That will be what the JR will tell us. But at some point negotiations did occur - and some kind of deal was agreed - even if only provisionally. That's not one sides version of events.

Michael I did see your thread and your questions but I am not able to answer them. If I could I would happily do so. As for your other questions, you have highlighted perfectly my some of my frustrations. I am just a normal fan. I have a season ticket. I don't travel generally to away games as...

You've missed my point - I'm not trying to argue the reasons behind what happened. And you are right until we have the same statement from CCC there may be additional events that took place. But you can't dispute that a HoT was agreed - even if it was not followed through. We will get all the...

No

Come on you're no mug. You know exactly what you are doing. That's the PR finesse.

There are plenty of people... just have a look at Twitter.

Context is very clever thing. In your headline you state Coventry City owner in court battle with charity. Your sub heading then says claim and counter-claim which implies that's the order of action respectively. SISU claim, Higgs counter-claim. You then reversed the name sequence further...

So do tell us about the 'statement of facts' produced for the court case - I didn't even know one existed. Share it all with us. And last time I checked the judge threw out BOTH SISU's counterclaim and the original claim from Higgs. In which case both sides put forward this 'selective and...

It sounds like a scene from Fonejacker.... 'We just need your bank account and sort code'

The funny thing about coming out of the woodwork is that you expose the cracks...

I posted a new one today. check it out :D

I'm pretty sure that the link to the file I posted earlier states they did. Check it out

On a slightly different note... I wonder of Higgs would have wanted half of the £7m fee from IoC straight away? That would have been a good windfall for them and their charity to invest on their ventures.

Yes it was. But you don't produce a document for court with 5000 pages of supplementary evidence that is completely fictional. If they for example said a meeting happened on a specific date then it was supplemented with minutes. Or if an email correspondence happened copies of it are put in. If...

I meant a potential of Higgs' share to SISU.

So does that explain why Higgs deal was immediately vetoed?

But your clearly said that Higgs did not accept the £2m offer. But then you said an agreement was in place that SISU backed out of by not completing. So which is it??