Search results

As someone said previously on another thread... it was voluntary. ACL chose to reject it. If they had chosen differently we may have had a significantly better position for all sides by now.

To be fair - none of the actions are disassociated. They are all connected. This is the point where both sides need to give a little. SISU need to drop the court appeal, and ACL need to retract their previous stance on only dealing once monies paid. The money is with the FL now, its their call...

Actually Michael it depends on both parties to get themselves together and do a deal. Perhaps you were not aware of the existence of the other party in this deal, much like your rental offer that you didn't clear with the most important party.

I'm struggling to see what the difficulty is. The FL have said that SISU have paid the full amount into the ESCROW. So it's been ringfenced and no-one can get hold of it until FL say so. The club only thing the club can do now is drop the legal action... which they should do as a matter of...

1)The move to Sixfields was clearly not about revenue... and yes I agree that it wad done to try and put pressure on ACL. It hasn't worked so now they have got to take a different approach. As I have said on several occasions, the only viable long term solution is for them to buy out ACL in its...

Or you don't understand it.

They didn't buy them... only only purchase was Higgs obtaining the 50% share of ACL sold by CCFC.

Really? When exactly was that then?

SISU's responsibility is to pay the full monies into the ESCROW.. and now the FL have stated this has occurred. So the club is not going to be subject to any penalties. This is by far the more pressing fact that has been clarified at least. It is now the duty of the FL to investigate the claim...

If they are now going to concede to bring us back then let them all get on with it. It's a step in the right direction.

I notice they said own their own stadium.... no mention of build.

When they start re-developing Sixfields, will that mean the view from the hill will be reduced?

So the club have now done their bit. So all we need now is the JR appeal to be dropped and then negotiations can begin......... right?

ffs....

14th I believe. Lets hope they say no and we can close this chapter at least.

Profuse apologies for posting a truthful statement.

If they didn't like it then have the balls to say it.. don't hide behind the excuses that they did. Pretending they did it for the good of the fans is shameful. On your other point, no one is saying that ACL should not have their money. There is no excuse for it not to be paid. But all we have...

If the process was 'flawed' they are suggesting that something untoward happened. If this was the case it should have been reported accordingly and investigated by the appropriate authorities. Except they didn't do this... because the reality is they didn't like the outcome, rather than it...

I agree - a sustainable model should be based on the fact that tickets sales and matchday revenues should cover all outgoings. Things like player sales or windfalls from games like Arsenal should be a bonus that goes directly into improving the squad further. This is what we have to aim for...

The judgement had absolutely nothing to do with the 590K payment did it? Anyone can clearly see that JR was a spectacular fail for SISU. The council were lawfully correct in their actions. I don't actually see anyone disputing this (apart from TF) This is about the 'agreement' after the CVA...