Search results

I can't believe they're going to VAR this one for a pen , but not the Maguire one. He had no clue he was there.

Jesus christ, Maguire.....

Rice is unlucky not to have a goal there.

Honestly cannot wait for this shitfest of a season to be over. Although let's face it, nobody's closing down that kind of an advantage and staying within the cost cap. It just isn't possible. I can see it being quite a while before I'm fully engrossed in this sport again. I've not sat and...

It's a typical F1 solution to a problem. Like that race in Spa, where they desperately held out to do just enough laps so they could declare a race result, which meant all those ticket holders sat in the pissing rain couldn't get a refund. I swear, no other sport in the world manages to shoot...

No sugar coating it, that was absolutely shocking.

Bloody hell, what's going on!

Goal!? Nah, must be a dream.....

Apparently the Stewards had to give it, because there is no remit in the regulations to allow them to show discretion. How absurd is that? So, anything that happens resulting in needing to change components to new ones outside of the allocated number, it has to be a penalty. I'd be amazed if...

This is turning into a proper farce, isn't it. I'd say it's unbelievable they're making Sainz take a penalty for something so far out of his or the teams control, but then it's the FIA. They don't do common sense. If they did, none of this malarkey would even be happening.

I'm thinking of getting Disney just to watch it, but this is the one thing putting me off. The pure sight of the man is usually enough to make me want to vomit, and that's before he opens his big, whiny gob.

Surely no doubt about that penalty

That's unlucky for Chelsea.

Because it's Anthony Taylor. Don't worry he'll be demoted again soon. And we all know where he'll end up when he does.

Bloody good game, though.

That's what it's come to. Forensically analysing someone's arm position in relation to if the whole of the ball has crossed the line first. They aren't going to be satisfied until they've sucked absolutely all the emotion out of the game with this malarkey are they.

That would have been another joke if they'd ruled that out. So, I'm surprised they didn't.....

Looked like Haaland had every bit as much of the defender's shirt as the defender did of Haaland's.

Liverpool didn't deserve anything out of that game.

Isn't the motion towards the ball itself enough to be counted as interfering though? Genuinely don't know with offside any more!