Search results

A little rich coming from you.

Yes - if you'd bothered to look at the quote that my reply came from I was referring to the F&B quote in 2009.

Only strange because as usual you weren't making any sense. You were going on about some formula deal for 10m etc... which is not the same thing as suggested here. We aren't even talking about the same time period.

Of course this is right and what should have happened. There are however two factors in this point - firstly that SISU were incompentent in getting this done, but perhaps more significantly, if SISU had been competent in doing this, would there have been a deal available for them? I don't think...

If we were to achieve this - outside of Coventry people will forget that Wasps are even here. It's taking advantage of football's universal popularity. Imagine making the PL... the monies we would receive from TV rights and prize money... with virtually none of it going to Wasps.

I don't want to watch them either - but to make a statement one time... We could do a Poznan and sing our songs without actually watching the game.

They should be afraid that football will continue to be infinitely more popular than rugby ever will. We have to use this to our advantage.

5000 CCFC fans - decked out in Sky Blue, singing the Sky Blue Song non-stop for the match, drowning both teams support. That's gonna get us noticed.

What was in the confidelity clause back in the Richardson/McGinnity era?

So you've just proven that they were unable to buy Higgs' share at the time of acquisition of CCFC.

It's always the same - spout off like you know everything, then as soon as you can't answer you resort to verbal abuse.

So if you had understood Nick's point in the first place he was referring directly to the point at which SISU arrived in 2007. Pay attention

In 2007??? So I'll ask again - seeing as you don't appear to understand. If the deal was £10m for half of Ricoh in 2007, then why would CCC have SISU as preferred bidders if they only thought it was worth £6m? Why did the not select either of the other two bidders who both publicly expressed...

How many times are you going to dodge the relevant question?

I'm sure the Observer will be on board.

I don't think it is per se, but it's more about positive news - are the CET going to support a CCFC positivity drive..?

Agree - but they don't seem able to distinguish between anti SISU and anti CCFC, all whilst keeping the vermin happy.

So where does this revelation come from? And again if that was really the actual deal then why have SISU as preferred bidder??

Paying kids 3k a week without a single first team appearance is the kind of thing that got us in this mess in the first place.

Why were the other 2 bidders who wanted to buy the stadium or at least a share not the preferred ones over SISU? o_O