Search results

Yes they would like better conditions (boo hoo), release on bail (should have thought about that before they broke the law) and the law changed so they are not guilty anyway. Honestly I have no time for these people and hopefully its a lesson to smug middle class people who think they can be...

Mine hasn't - I have never agreed that people should be allowed benefits for a prolonged period We have made it worse by dumping PIP payments on people who clearly do not need it but will claim - it should be scrapped

What is £5k?

Lazy argument. The state should not be a lifestyle choice for anyone. I do not support child benefit payments either. They should be vouchers where there is proof the child is the recipient of the benefit

Oddly most of them worked

No its common sense. Its not OK for the state to provide for a long period away from contributing and earning. Life is not charity of benefits and handouts paid by other people who have worked.

There is zero excuse for able bodied people not to be able to find work over a period of time. The notion the state should pay for someone for years of unemployment is nonsense It can never be a lifestyle choice.

Well they would as I have already stated anyone not working after a time out of work should have benefits - including NI contributions - removed so no state pension. Anyone who has looked after a child while the spouse / partner has worked should be an exception as they are saving childcare...

They deliberately committed a crime which has to policed at significant cost If they refuse to eat that is up to them.

They will had to have worked to qualify for it - that is my point

They had a choice Fuck around and find out

Anyone who has not worked for a lengthy period of time should have all benefits removed anyway

Who words "who cares" spring to mind https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/nov/18/sally-rooney-says-uk-prisoners-linked-to-palestine-action-face-shocking-mistreatment

Its no different to most other similar countries - stop making things up https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/wealth-inequality-by-country

There was an 83% super tax under the Labour government in the 70’s and combined with an asset tax added up to 98% - it didn’t end very well

Tony voted for Cameron and Osborne

Ouch

No as it was said the total cost was then offset by a wealth tax which in reality wouldn’t even cover that cost - which itself isn’t fully declared

Hes backtracking - he also is trying to claim that a wealth tax will generate a £23 billion credit on it. As usual he’s all over the place

Ah that’s blown it