Search results

I understood perfectly. It’s you who are struggling with the process of brexit going around in circles without actually making a point. Unless the point was admitting that you don’t understand the process.

They were both brexit secretaries. Of coarse they were responsible for delivering the agreement. Just because you want to give them a free pass doesn’t make them innocent.

Davis never understood the mechanism of what he campaigned for and was massively out of his depth. Remember we’re talking about a man who thought we could do trade deals with individual EU countries. He actually resigned stating that his vision of brexit no longer aligned with the government...

It was agreed by the government following negotiations which including brexiteers such as David Davis and Dominic Raab. Fortunately for them the so called by some traitor Gina Miller made sure that parliament had to ratify the withdrawal agreement giving Davis and Raab the opportunity to vote...

Do you actually have a point to make or are you just lonelier than usual today?

Are you dizzy because you’re going around in circles. See previous reply where I talk about David Davis saying the divorce bill wasn’t £35B on his way into the negotiation and then coming out the meeting later that same day saying yeah it is £35B. Like I said IIRC the so called divorce bill was...

Depends if we pass a withdrawal agreement through parliament or not. If we pass a withdrawal agreement we enter into a transitional period of 2 years IIRC, possibly more if an extension is agreed. This period sees a continuation of the current free trade agreement and is the period in which the...

Well then you need to make your point better because I really can’t see what else you can take from your post other than you’ve failed to understand that the trade agreement is separate from the withdrawal and the process as set out in article 50 is that the trade negotiations follow an agreed...

The trade agreement is a separate thing to the withdrawal agreement.

It includes a lot of things. You’re still not making your point though.

It’s a settlement of obligations and the amount was agreed in the withdrawal negotiations that make up the withdrawal agreement. In fact IIRC it was the very first thing we agreed. You may remember David Davis famously saying it’s no where near £35B after it being suggested it was in the press...

Sorry Pete. I didn’t mean to be blasphemous.

Jesus Christ just make your point.

No, it was invoked not signed. The withdrawal agreement had to be negotiated as a result of invoking article 50. 18 months and 599 pages of negotiations later it was published so it could be debated before being accepted by parliament by way of a vote. It’s the process parliament agreed to when...

The negotiations lasted for 18months before it could be published in November last year. It’s almost 600 pages long. Have you been living in a cave or are you just pretending to be stupid?

The withdrawal agreement is part of article 50.

David “we can make individual deals with EU countries” Davis agreed it and it forms part of the withdrawal agreement. The withdrawal agreement is a contract. The only reason it won’t pass parliament is because those who promoted a withdrawal agreement won’t vote for it. Having mostly not wanting...

I was once told (if you mean stained class windows) that you have to clean them with a dry cloth otherwise you pull minerals of the lead and it leaves residue on the glass. Seems to backup what you’re saying.

The contract is article 50.

Some of the parallels between Mosley and Ferage are scary. Fair enough Ferage has tried and failed to enter Westminster through election but he’s still expecting and talking about having a pact and say with an elected government. People like Rees-Mogg are clearly happy to align themselves with...