Search results

Been very anti Trump in the past, could it be to try and persuade sceptical Republicans to vote for him?

Note to self - caution, Josh Eccles dad and Roman Kemp fan clubs heavily active on this forum.

Then they'll be a counter appeal, it could run for some time yet. Though not sure if Trump can kill it if/when he becomes president

Josh Eccles didnt get where he is because of his dad!

No doubt a wrong un but still young enough to turn his life around, unfortunately he won't get chance. The irony been if he'd received the prison sentence he should of he'd probably still be alive.

I think it's one of the few issue on here where there's pretty much consensus with most in agreement there should be tighter gun controls in the US but the people of the US don't seem to agree! If regular mass shootings in school don't change their minds I'm not sure the attempted assassination...

No chance. And it's not even his stance, it's the crackpot in the NRA who he'll appease.

I don't show compassion to rapists but you crack on if that's your thing.

A dick with half his ear missing

That's true, but I think it's fair to say he wanted to put an end to his presidential campaign.

Why would I be sore about either event? Weird turn of phrase. But I'm not the one being a hypocrite. And as far as I'm concerned, it's absolutely appropriate to bring up Capitol Hill after what happened yesterday, the fact you dont think it is doesn't change my opinion one iota, though if...

Capitol Hill has a huge connection to what happened yesterday, it definitely should be brought up. And look at the posts on this thread, prior to yesterday, which tried to have serious discussions on Capitol Hill that got the usual laughing emoji, all of a sudden the same people don't think...

No it doesn't. It shines a light on the hypocrites on here and elsewhere here who supported violence as a method of subverting democracy when it suited them. Capitol hill was wrong, the attempt to assassinate Trump was,wrong, but some people support the former and not the latter.

No it doesn't. It's shining a light on the hypocrites on here. You either disagree with trying to subvert democracy using violence or you don't. There are people on here who've been throwing out the laughing emojis every time someone mentions Capitol Hill who all of sudden have developed a...

People on here who were cheering on the capitol hill attacks getting their knickers in a twist about this, fucking clowns.

Wasn't as bad as the holocaust though, makes you think.

The planes, trains and automobiles sequel is a bit darker than the original.

It's should be OK, he's maxed out on his luggage allowance.

Yeah, I'm not dismissing links but it is a fact that this possessive behaviour predates it. But your point is a good one.

I think we're conflating two things here, children having access to porn at a worryingly young age and possessive men not dealing with rejection. The former is a fairly new phenomenon, the 2nd is as old as time.