Search results

The minute his ears stopped ringing he'll have started planning it, it's clear that's what's going on. Got a family member who's a copper apparently Who won't go into work because he fears for his safety, imagine they'll be a claim going in there as well. To be fair, a lad I knew, great lad...

My thoughts when I heard it so I googled it, you can get a cyst on the brain from an impact injury. (Add neurology to the list of my areas of expertise)

Manchester police facing alot of scrutiny at the moment because of the conduct of its officers so I think that will play in to any decision and he could be in trouble.

There's no argument over the stabbing though. There's disagreement on this issue. Edit - ignore this remark, just been on the thread, arguments begun.

Why is it inefficient? Given the figures banded about by Poverty action groups about the cost of child poverty I'd say its nobrainer,(if their figures are correct)

Fucks sake. The world is going mad.

I'm old enough to remember when the police were proper wankers. People should be careful what they wish for. If you think they only dished it out to those who deserved it you're sadly deluded. That's the reason they got reigned in, though they are far too soft these days.

The video I saw doesn't look good for the officer involved. But going by this thread it's clearly missing some pretty important events leading up to it. If whatever disciplinary investigation only ses the video I saw, he's in trouble but hopefully the full story emerges.

So what do they want? The amendment is irrelevant really, all its done is shone a light on the fact that there's an opportunity to help some of those who have suffered most under austerity and Starmer refuses to take it.

More nonsense. I praised them the other day for the way they're conducting themselves but when they fuck up I'll say so. I don't expect them to turn things round overnight but this could be sorted fairly quickly and relatively cheaply. You're the one performing mental gymnastics to defend them.

You can post stupid gifs all you want, it's factually correct. Saying he'll do it in Autumn or in the New Year means he's content to carry on with George Osbournes policy.

He explains nothing, Starmer has it within his power to set the wheels in motion to lift tens of thousands of children out of poverty and hes choosing not to. You support choice.

Never heard of him before but a quick look at his X feed tells me he's the epitome of a centrist wank.

Problem is our whole society is structured around continued population growth, at some point it will surely need to change?

. You're defending Starmers decision not to use his first few weeks in office to lift thousands of children out of poverty. It's really not difficult, or apparently it is (y)

It should have been in there in the first place.

PVA hasn never heard of Clement Attlee

Who's wrong about it? People are saying it should have been in the Kings speech, that won't be altered by lifting it in Autumn, though better late than never

Trying to amend bills is show? If I look back to Labour's amendment to the Gaza bill proposed by the SNP what am I going to find you saying?

Those bloody corbynites, wanting to lift children out of poverty.