Search results

This is the difficult point. If he ignored the bill passed on super Saturday and allowed the vote to take place that would not have been demonstrating impartiality either.

According to Kiar Starmer on Andrew Marr yesterday the opposition believes that the deal has a trap door for a no deal brexit and as Boris and co’s reputations go before them no one trusts them to vote for the deal and then the legislation required to complete it. Thus forcing a no deal brexit...

You brought up something that you thought would change if we’d voted remain. I brought the veto up because we had already taken the measure required to make sure it didn’t happen. You then accuse me of denying that the EU had a plan to achieve something that I’d already acknowledged they had by...

The government should stick to the process that was passed on Saturday then and stop delaying the final vote on the deal by trying to put the cart before horse. You do realise that it’s the leave government that is taking the piss out of you and no one else?

You do understand that the government made this motion knowing full well it would be rejected? They could have started motions today for the legal text instead but decided to piss around doing this instead. It’s the government who is drawing out the process no one else. They’re too busy...

Yay. Parliamentary sovereignty is alive and well. Just like the leavers voted for. I suspect they’ll be delighted by this decision.

No. I’m saying Boris, Gove, Raab, Cummings ect promised leave with a deal. They even went as far as we’ll join EFTA and as far as I’m aware that involves membership of the Single Market and Schengen. You told me I was incorrect when actually if you refer back to what was printed on the official...

Not according to the official vote leave website. Again, see link already provided.

See link already provided in the post above from the official leave campaign to see what out was promised.

Actually not Here’s a link to the official vote leave website on what leave looks like. 'Leave' looks like... as you can see it’s all about deals and treaties. Including “There is a European free trade zone from Iceland to the Russian border and we will be part of it.” Turns out we won’t, even...

Given that I acknowledged the policy by confirming we had a veto on it and you’ve then gone on to accusing me of denying that there’s any such policy I think that I’m justified in accusing you of rewriting the meaning of the word veto because actually you’ve done it twice now.

Because you idiot, without the legislation passing it won’t happen. Voting for the deal on its own won’t ensure it happens. It’s actually all in the article you yourself linked. Try reading and digesting what you yourself has provided before you go around accusing others of being an idiot. I...

You have to doubt it don’t you. It seems as though the government is still playing silly games and are setting their own deal up to fail so we can leave without a deal “accidentally”.

The majority of those that voted leave voted for leave with a deal. That’s what Parliament is trying to do. You do understand that Boris with his games has actually been the biggest single factor in delaying Brexit again should it happen. If he had done his job in the first place we would now be...

Then the oxygen thief should take his own life rather than someone who understands that we’re not doing enough.

You’re welcome. . . . Numpty.

As per the parliamentary democracy leavers apparently voted to protect. Not sure what you’re moaning about you’ve got exactly (in respect to parliamentary democracy) what you voted for. Enjoy the fruits of your labour and wind your neck in.

A) He hasn’t done that yet, calm yourself down. B) If he does do that it’s only until the legislation is in force which means that when the deal has passed it can be triggered with immediate effect, so calm yourself down. C) The speaker isn’t breaking the law. No one is taking it to JR unlike...

I’ve not denied it. Merely pointed out that we’ve vetoed it. Pointing out that we’ve vetoed it is in itself a recognition of it’s existence. Really not sure how you claim I’ve denied anything. Unlike yourself.

Even if we don’t whatever we replace it with is going to be heavily influenced by the science of preserving fish stocks. On that basis it will be based on the same science that the EU uses to set fishing quotas so it’s not going to be much different if at all.