Search results

I guess its hard to grasp them as they tend to change what they say, sometimes they even tell little untruths. The article talks about wanting the freehold, now that they have realised this doesn't give them access to revenue, so they want the freehold with all the existing leases cancelled. Or...

What about if you were paying the average rate? How are you getting on with the list of all the things the Council have got to answer for?

Very knowledgeable City fan, makes many well reasoned points (even though I don't necessarily agree with all of them). This forum would be a poorer place without him. It's good to have a bit of healthy challenge every now and again, it's when we all start to agree with him that we know we're in...

Otium have accepted the offer was made via the Football League. There is a Q&A on the Sky Blue Trust website (can't post the link at present).

It's a shame he's not allowed to speak in public anymore.

You're a SISU hater, you said so at the start of this thread.

Could you list all the things that the Council need to answer for (in regard to our situation, not that there's loads of litter about).

Target them in what way? What do you want each party to do?

But of course the boat is a tangible item, what is the tangible item that makes a football club? is it the Golden Share, if so I'd never heard of it until this mess started so maybe a football club doesn't fit the old philosophical debate.

I think it is far more likely that we'll miss out by more than 10 points, we're 11 points off now and it appears as if Clarke will be going, and of course Wilson is out for a while. We should be more concerned about the bottom four than the top six.

I think those perceiving that are missing the point, maybe deliberately to try to cause a row. I agree that a big turnout at the Ricoh at the same time as a game in Northampton would be a good way of showing the support is still in Coventry, but I think that all involved in this already know...

Just look back at all the other threads on this, no new info will come from starting another thread.

I don't see it as hypocritical at all, to me it shows that distance isn't the issue, the issue is that's it's wrong to take a club from its home City for no good reason.

I read this one, and although I realise you are in sole charge of rating players, I do think that if Pressley agreed with you he wouldn't have put up with a player who was just trotting about, not even breaking sweat. Are you saying Pressley is a poor manager?

Nope. There isn't a cure for cancer, but quite rightly it doesn't stop people pointing out the problems with it.

No one is going to buy the club from SISU for the foreseeable future. They aren't selling, they still think they can recover their investors money, and I can't imagine anyone would trust them enough to do a deal with them. This is a long term shit storm, and a happy ending (not that sort), is...

If Pressley thought Clarke wasn't doing the job he would have been subbed, regardless of whether the bench is weak or not, or do you consider Pressley to weak to do that? Moussa was excellent, no one has doubted that, but if people are saying Clarke wasn't trying by comparing him to Moussa...

I would ask whether you've ever wanted to leave a job to get a better one, but from the way you form sentences it's not clear whether you've done the whole school thing yet.

I thought the way to buy things that aren't for sale is to get the person who doesn't want to sell to get a valuation, then the buyer gets a valuation done, and then you pay the middle figure.

You agree with Pressley that Clarke was doing the job required at the required level, fortunately a replacement wasn't necessary.