Search results

I'd rather we played with 10 than get Jon Stead in.

I think we'll be lucky if its a nothing game. Unless Wilson comes back soon and starts getting goals again, then I think it'll be a close finish for us. We could do with some games being postponed until he's fit again, hope it keeps raining on Sixfields.

As long as they were prepared to be called a greedy bastard by some, then they'd be off like a shot.

Everyone knows all your favourite ex players ended up there, did they leave when your best mate Thorn was in charge?

Maybe if they thought we'd end up there anyway.

I see the poll that bears a resemblance to your name isn't looking too good for that Grendull fella, do you think this will be his last day on here?

I disagree with your opinion of the Arsenal display, I agree with Pressley about that one, I don't think he was lying when he gave his view, do you? Pressley is now correct in my view to criticise a player if he thinks was fit to play, if the player refused to play.

I thought everyone knew too, but the fella asking me the questions doesn't seem to get it.

Good one. You might want to speak to Hill83 he does this sort of thing, but his ones are funny.

No, strangely I'm not his agent. I'm just trying to help you drama queens out by pointing out it is just a job to players, they don't support the team, and they will all leave when the time is right. What is it you don't like about players that leave, the fact that they are going for more money...

So you're saying that Pressley has been defending him, and now he's being critical. Do you want Pressley 'to give it up and piss off'?

Of course it's created, what else would it be? Created by Clarke, with the purpose of getting a better job. I don't think anyone is suggesting some kind of conspiracy (apart from you maybe).

You mean you want him to stay?

Offers have been made, and been rejected, which is fair enough. Him being a 'dickhead' is unlikely to have changed over the last few years, did this stop you celebrating any of his goals?

If his rent only made up 10% of his overheads I imagine he'd look at his other costs first.

Quote: Because the way out current owners act I really wouldn't be surprised if they take action against him! And fair play if they do. His job is to play football and if he doesn't do it he doesn't get paid :End Quote They tried that with Dublin but still had to pay in the end, and I suspect...

Thanks I was just asking. So do you know that they won't be paying £10k? It would be good to take some money off Leicester wouldn't it.

Agree with all of that.

So are you suggesting (even though you're not bothered), that the costs equated to £2 per head of the crowd? I think Leicester will pay more than that per head.

I thought you weren't bothered?