Search results

Those figures are just the clubs turnover broken down. Commercial revenue is all non ticket and non F&B's releted income for the club. I.e TV money, shirt sales, advertising.

If we're talking about rent deals then we can't forget about ACL, the Council has no legal authority to negotiate rent. If your saying that the Council are looking at selling their share of ACL then that is feesable. However, Sisu have shown that they are strongly opposed to Councils using...

How exactly? The court ruling against the council would not change the fact that CCFC Ltd are in administration, that a rental agreement exists between ACL and CCFC Ltd, and that Sisu are no longer in control of CCFC Ltd. ACL cannot negotiate with CCFC Holdings while it has an agreement with...

The commercial side of them figures still goes to the club, nothing at all to do with the council.

I fail to see how this court case affects whether we get new owners or not. The two things are unrelated.

Deal can only be done with Ltd, it now has nothing to do with Sisu.

These things take time. As for what is happening with the squad, that would have happened regardless due to ffp.

If this leads to getting rid of Sisu then it will all be worth it.

Daryll Murphy is the sports reporter on Free Radio.

What a self righteousness idiot. Because someone has a different opinion to you then they are not a fan?

The title of this thread kinda reminds me of this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROFit7MrxtU

I don't have a problem if PH4, Sisu, or anyone make a fortune out of our football club. The only way to really make any money back is through success. The reason I want Sisu out is because they basically don't know their arse from their elbow.

I do agree that until his report is produced for the court we don't really know where we are. However I think some are criticising because he is expressing opinions on what CCFC Holdings should/are doing. He has no authority to speak on behalf of Holdings, nor has he any right to ask them to...

Its quite simple how I see it. If the academy belongs to ccfc ltd then the administrator needs to pay. If it belongs to holdings then sisu needs to pay. Why is the administrator expecting sisu to pay for something he is responsible for?

<p> We only know the council wont sell to sisu, which I personally think is justified.

<p> What were our league positions?

<p> If, as you say, last season was our normal support level, then doesn't that show how rock solid our support is? I mean, the worst season in 50 years yet our support remained normal.

<p> You dont think success bring in more fans?

<p> Off the top of my head it was just under 21k.

<p> Strange as I remember 20k regularly in the late 90's. They both got good crowds due to owners that care and success on the pitch. What crowds should a 16th placed 3rd division club get?