Search results

I think even if the council have acted illegally, they have been very clever. The loan to acl was agreed at a full council meeting, meaning the whole council is responsible. The leadership merely proposed it.

It would be rather difficult to lock up all 54 city councillors.

Simple fact is if you run a business you, and you alone are responsible for that business. Sisu are the sole owners, they call all the shots. If they put themselves in a situation where they are vulnerable to administration by an outside company then that is poor management on their part...

Sisu wouldn't accept it as they feel very strongly about councils that abuse state aid rules. They would insist on paying the full market value.

B grade A level actually. But seen as I'm so stupid, please explain to me how without Council oppression the club would now be in the Premiership?

Simple question for him, if the Golden Share isn't in Ltd, why has he not just liquidated the company?

The majority of that debt has acrrued because we have bought shite players on high wages. That would not have changed whether we owned the stadium or not. The council are not to blame for at least £42m of our debt, neither are they to blame for the clubs poor transfer and managerial...

Ok, so the club is £60m in debt, since 2005 the club has spent around £8m on rent, and lost out on maybe £10m worth of revenue streams (and that is being generous). So taking away the whole stadium issue, the club would still be £42m in debt, so where is this premier league budget coming from?

But Sisu set up the box, how can the Council be held responsible for what is in it?

The FA and Football league seem to disagree.

Thats what I don't understand with them. Hedge funds usually act very quickly. They take over a business, try to restructure it and sell it on or if they cant, shut it down. What they don't do is piss about for 5 years losing money.

Have Sisu ever actually put a serious bid in for the ground?

<p> Good point, the millions of international Coventry Telegraph readers will now all know the name Pete Waterman. He will go from a nobody to household name all thanks to the telegraph.

Why is it that certain posters come out with the line of "I dont care about ACL, all I care about is city", then when Acl agree a loan arrangement they are all over them? If you are only interested in the football club then where Acl borrows its money from is nothing to do with you.

<p> So ccfc should have a say on what another private business puts its money into? Im all for ccfc owning the Ricoh, but your post makes no sense.

<p> That's simple to understand yet there is more chance of Andy Thorn being the next utd manager than sisu getting their money back.

Hope he hasn't lost interest.

Front garden if you live in a rough area.

<p> He would most probably have his lawyers onto you.

Is tango kens account anyone on here?