Search results

Why could they not have just transfered the golden share to holdings and liquidate Ltd in the first place?

Why would it be laughed out? Its a contractual agreement.

Strange, you opened the thread with a swear word. Are you bald?

I don't really understand the point of this thread. Was it a feeble attempt at trying to encourage more people to follow the club to Walsall?

Ok, I'll piss off. Enjoy watching another Sisu devised relegation.

This is my opinion too. The only time on here I have criticised someone for going is when they criticise me for not.

Its null and void for only the period in administration. The contract still exists, it doesn't just go away because Tim Fisher says so.

I don't think it will happen either. For a start Fisher said it would be nearer town than the Ricoh. The Ricoh is 3.3 miles from Broadgate. A 3.3 mile radius of Broadgate gives very little outside the actual city, and the few areas that are outside the city are greenbelt so that would be a no...

Not really. The original rent agreement still exists, they haven't explained how they get around that yet.

Normal business practice

The difference is they knew exactly what they had to do, just keep on fighting.

Slag!! :)...........

But I don't really see how the FL can authorise that.

From Brighton? Do you own a concord?

Well fortunately for my principles the words sisu and success don't go together so I will never have to deal with the dilemma you have presented.

At what point then will Ccfc Ltd have "broke" the lease? Presumably acl can't take any action until that point?

The club isn't in administration according to Tim fisher. From a supporters point of view though, how has it made things worse?

Also, if the Rotherham situation is anything to go by, they will have to put a £1m bond down with the FL.

Agree with you there.

So your going to prove your not one of the fans jumping ship to support Walsall by going and using their ground and putting money towards Walsall's transfer fund?