Search results

I'd get Jordan Clarke back, but only play him as a right back.

What would be said in these conversations? There is nothing at all to support your conspiracy theory that Higgs are being forced to sell against their wishes.

They did not have to sell. If they did not want Wasps to buy from the Council they could have used their veto.

Let him speak for himself. They have a choice, they want to sell to Wasps.

Thanks Simon, who did this clarification come from?

I think that is one of those stats that is said for effect rather than giving a real illustration, we must have been exempt from the first round for the vast majority of those fifty years.

Yep, still a terrible result but would have been worse without his two saves at the end, and I think he got down to one by the post as well.

I thought he was our second best player today. I agree with the rest of your post.

Without adding any emotive words, or filling in any gaps with guesswork, what actually did JOB do that was so wrong that other professionals would get sacked for?

I bet they sold more programmes than the last time we had 8k watching. So nothing back fired then, that's good.

I was surprised that Nouble came off, but he hadn't contributed to the game at all, so not a terrible decision as such. I thought Maddison had an average game by normal standards but was our best player in a poor team performance. I also would rate JOB higher than many have done, mainly for...

I'll ignore the deranged 'publicity stunt' phrase, but how exactly did the idea of giving money to charity back fire, did they not sell any programmes?

Very confident of a comfortable win today, a 5 or 6 margin.

BBC1 are showing bits of 8 (I think) games today, from just before 2pm today, I think the idea is to show goals and some action as it happens.

I prefer when the donation is known, in this case £1, I'm always wary when reference is made to all profits being donated, this is too vague, all sorts of costs could be added in and the donation minimised. If this is the sort of thing we're going to criticise then, well, actually, I'm lost for...

Yep, I agree all businesses should have the same opportunity to be promoted. To promote one company on the Council website at the expense of all others is not something I agree with, as I've written before.

It's a business bringing people and money in to the City, I don't mind that being advertised.

I'm criticising the Council as I think they should promote local businesses more.

You should see from my first post that we agree on this, your blatant disregard of what some people write to further your anti council bias is disturbing.

I think it's been the way for many years that the number of offers reduce the financial value of the season ticket, but part of the reason for having a season ticket is to give your financial support to the club at the start of the season, and it also saves the hassle of going up to buy tickets...