Search results

What do we need to be able to come out of the embargo? Just submit accounts for holdings? Or does limited admin also need to be sorted.

As far as they know they weren't trying to develop the land around their stadiums - which will make money. The football side of the business is likely to make a loss, however, I think it would be reasonable if we were filling our ground to make the club break even. I think the real point is...

We won't be at the Ricoh under SISU. Bridges have been burnt from both sides. Sad mess all parties have got our club into.

It's never been the case they cannot afford it. Thought this was generally accepted.

And by the way, if I had to be pushed into a decision I may go with option 2 as they, for me, would be the team representing my home city. I personally would prefer a club with fan ownership, if we were to start fresh.

How is it pro-SISU? I was concerned it may be too loaded the other way. Think you just like to try to be controversial and stir things up but everyone sees right through you.

Devils advocate for those going with option 1. If the name was with option 2 would that switch you to that option? Is that what you consider key? Or is it something else?

Depends what you consider the real club really I guess. Have to say I am on the fence about this. The history matters to me more than anything. That I can say my club was in the top flight for 34 years and won the FA Cup in 1987 matters more than the name or the colour of the kit. And of...

Brendan Rogers is unbelievably now the 5th longest serving manager in the Premier League at just under a year. Shocking. Alan Pardew is second believe it or not.

If Haskell and co. bought CCFC Limited but then the league/Appleton announced golden share was with holdings forcing Haskell and co. to start a new Coventry club lower down the leagues, which club would you support? 1. Club owned by SISU called Coventry City but playing outside Coventry (at...

Crazy isn't it. Don't know why some people think this is even a semi reasonable thing to suggest. It's just idiotic.

Surely you will have seen from the minutes on the SBT website that they have made arrangements for a potential future share issue. Why not join and attend meetings to get your opinion heard. Or maybe that isn't as easy a ranting behind a keyboard.

Most true supporters would still follow the club regardless of the league it was in. I don't think PH4 would invest as he is looking for a club with Premier League ambitions. By this he means in the near future I would suggest. Should be fan ownership if a Phoenix club had to be started...

He's right. Don't think the club would drop that low unless it was liquidated. Just wouldn't happen.

That's fine, it's your choice and I respect that. Others would though. No one is thinking we would get 32,000. And it shoul definitely not be plan A, but a plan B needs to be ready if needed.

Mainly because they are disillusioned with the club. A fresh start would maybe bring a lot of those back. Particularly when the prices will be a lot lower.

First thing to do would be to discuss options with Supporters Direct. Think they helped a number of other clubs "start up". I know some will always be against this. That is fine, everyone is entitled to their own view. It may work out that what would be left of the Phoenix club in 10 years is a...

Yet. They may do. And yes I would rather follow a Coventry City run properly in league 2 than one backed by SISU above.

Probably the same businesses that already sponsor clubs at that level. No one is saying it is easy but FCUM and Wimbledon have done exactly this. It can be done. If its not for you, that's fine, no one is going to force you to support them.

No way. What right do we have to move Nuneaton out of Nuneaton.