Search results

But he would have inherited one if he bought CCFC limited.

What would you do if CCFC decided they were permanently relocating to Northampton (or anywhere else for that matter)?

That is the whole point though. Play in sky blue, in Coventry, sing CCFC songs, etc...

That is not to say it wouldn't happen without the trust by the way. If enough people wanted to do it, it could happen regardless. For me it would depend on the situation of CCFC. What the future held, etc. I know there are many others out there who want this to happen regardless as they are...

It can be both. It is a breakaway club that is a reborn CCFC. It would have the heart, soul & spirit of CCFC. FFS terminology is not really that important.

What?

Don't get the point. Are you saying if SBT had a majority vote on starting afresh that they would have to disband? That makes no sense. The reborn club would be sky blues too and would take the lifeblood of the club, the fans, with it.

It couldn't technically be a Phoenix club in the same way Wimbledon can't and FC United can't. It is not necessarily a rival club either (although it could become so). It should be called a breakaway club.

I didn't say I would set up a breakaway club regardless. If SISU demonstrate they are coming back then I would not do anything. I am just saying if enough people want to do it it will happen regardless of whether the trust want to be involved. All I ask from the trust is that if SISU do not...

Can you not read? Is a member vote not a sign of democracy?

Sphinx is for Sphinx fans. Are you really that dumb that you don't get that simple point.

Everyone has a right to be involved if they want to. Jan obviously does not. That is his personal opinion not the trusts. He can only speak on behalf of the trust after there has been a member vote.

What gives you the right to decide it wouldn't be? The fact of the matter is it would be a team for Coventry City fans to support (and by that I mean attend games) as there currently isn't one. This argument is pointless. Neither of you will change your opinion and neither of those opinions...

Obvious really. You don't want to be involved so when it happens you won't be. If you want to be involved you will pay your membership and will be. Think what he means is that you saying no won't stop it happening.

He does seem to have a thing for you.

Who is Kirk on here? Spill the beans...

I don't really get how it works. If I own Company X and invest an initial £1 million then things start going bad so I chuck the rest of my money at it (I wish) to the point where I go into administration. My only real debt is a few thousand in missed rent for my business premises. In this case...

Just seen Hearts supporters group 'Foundation of Hearts' have been awarded preferred bidder status. Not sure if they were the highest bidder but looking back to Portsmouth, when their trust was chosen it was because it was best for the long term future of the club, not because they were highest...

Presumably by your comment here you would be happy to wait 5, maybe even 10 years for a new stadium to be built. I can't personally wait that long when there is a perfectly good stadium sat there (in fact it's one of the best stadia in the country).

Exactly what I thought. The posts are still way off topic for this thread too. I have been critical at times of the trust but can also see the good things they do. It does seem to me though that personal opinions are being followed on the Phoenix/breakaway club issue rather than members...