Search results

Cardiff have been, but not that keen to sign him are they? I said that Barnett's performances for us were awful, Keogh's for us, have been okay, team in the Premiership has, and plays Barnett, no team in the Premiership, or "top-end Championship club", want to sign Keogh, ergo, Barnett, however...

If you could point me to anywhere that i have said "that Keogh could never be the player that Leon Barnett is"? Barnett had 11 games for us I think on loan, not the best, but only a snapshot of what he might do. I'm not saying at all that a player could never be good enough to play in the...

Heretic! Eternal Damnation will be your reward.

Logic is something which is a bit of a mystery to you isn't it? You're good enough for The Prem if you have never played there, been linked with a club who play there, or with a club likely to get there? If you have played in the Prem, or actually play in the Prem then you're not good enough...

Only really remember a couple of good games when he stood out and looked worth the money we spent on him, and went to all the home games that season, and a fair proportion of the away too. Leicester at home was good, in fact don't remember the second of the couple that he was good, so might be...

On the basis that Norwich haven't tried to get Keogh in to replace Barnett then yes. He was awful for us, seeming to do okay for Norwich at a higher level. Bellamy was awful for us, but been a pretty good player everywhere else. Juke was good for us though, so by your logic, Juke is a better...

You can't say that on here, it's like going to the Vatican to have an audience with the Pope, and saying "This God stuff, load of bollocks really isn't it?"

It's called supporting? How are your principles holding up by the way? Still making up, what you always call "facts", about McPakes great(rather didn't happen) 9 match unbeaten run, then being injured and the cause of our 10 match run without a win(despite playing in 5 of them)? Was wondering...

He was good enough to play in the Prem, and did. If being torn a new arsehole by Drogba means you're not qualified to defend at the top level, then there won't be any defenders in the top leagues in Europe. Now, if it had been by Carroll?

He's going to be missing out on the Bakewell Tarts now that he's married though.

No, but he played his entire career in the top flight, and was wanted by teams like Manchester United, not really a comparison with Keogh is it? Unless of course, he's turned down offers from Prem and top Championship clubs because he really likes walks round the Peak District? How is Keogh...

Didn't sound like we created many chances for a finisher anyway?

That'll be why it looks like he's signing for Derby then.

True, Dann, Fox, Westwood, Tabb, Ward, all fell foul of that. People saying that McPake was better than Dann, don't need Tabb, we have Baker, decent goalkeepers 10 a penny etc. All incoming players are great, and outgoing are crap. Keogh is neither, he's a reasonable Championship defender...

That would have been NLHWC

Never mentioned Barnet, was awful for us, but seems to be doing okay in the Prem. Ward is a better player than Keogh, also doing well in the Prem. Dann, Fox, Warnock, Davenport all better footballers and defenders than Keogh. Keogh moving from a team that got relegated to League One, to one...

So Keogh isn't being snapped up by any Premiership teams because he's too good?? Were you one of the guys who said that Boozy was far too good for us, and should be playing for Barcelona??

Nonleague thinks that Bigi is a £25million pound player, and that Keogh, McPake and Deegan are some of the best players he seen at the club, and that Baker and Bell are also very good players.

Have you not noticed the Alex Nimely threads? Brilliant apparently, his goal impressed a few people.

Check out all the bids from top, top sides after Keogh. Won't find any.