Search results

Fucks sake, the figures are on this website, just look at the top of the screen. You just don't want to know do you? "Loans. Much is discussed about the SISU and other loans. Here are the facts as have so far been made available. On takeover the net liabilities of the group were discounted...

Having the debt in itself back in those heady days, wasn't thought of as necessarily a bad thing, it could be rolled over and repackaged as an asset, which could be used as collateral for other loans. Unfortunately for the financial whizzkids all the slicing and dicing of these(generally classed...

They are on this board in the Board/finance discussions, not asking you to go down to companies house, let me know when you're next having a crap and i'll come and wipe your arse for you.

Showed you where to look for the facts, if you're too lazy to look them up yourself it's not really my problem.

In the accounts, in one of the stickys in board/finance discussion board, also something in the RR thread in there. Partiularly interesting the lack of value that Pro-Zone brought to the club.

He was disingenuous at best, though people who actually believed it had only themselves to blame really. The majority of debts not cleared on their take-over either, merely rolled up and repackaged(similar to the sub-prime debt was that started the whole financial crisis), just that Sisu were...

Those figures are nowhere else other than the Coventry Telegraph, are you saying that the Coventry Telegraph hasn't always regurgitated whatever information the club throws to it? Ranson is correct though, and the accounts are false, hooray, we are debt free again!

We can trust what is in the accounts I suppose, as they legally have to be signed off as accurate. Accept the figures in the accounts as true, then obviously the ex-chairman's statements are somewhat economical with the truth. As for the newspapers? Think the Telegraph the only newspaper with...

If, of course, we were ever anywhere likely to be involved in buying them at all. Which is doubtful.

Well, yes, which is why I mentioned the figures that Ranson gave, which bore no relation to those actually given in the clubs accounts. The clubs accounts that always showed an enormous amount of debt, for a "debt-free" club too. Figures designed to convince people of the legend of Ranson...

Harry Kewell? HK? Maybe it isn't Hong Kong investement after all.

According to Ranson we were debt free, so shouldn't really have been a problem buying them at the time should it? Of course, "According to Ranson", should be used in the same context as "pinch of salt". Where did you get the analysis of transfer revenues from? Know that the accounts a few...

We really are paying very low wages if that is the case. Based on the performances of a lot our players over the years though, renting a bedsit in a crack house in Wood End should be an aspiration.

Thats because you have no credibility on this forum with your veiw of you must be right regardless of facts which has often been exposed by other contributers on this forum No, I have only used facts, others such as Ginetta, and NLWH, make up "facts" which are I often expose as made up...

Because somebody else pays for you.despite your "principles". I know thers's a lot of competition, but think you speak even more shit than Ginetta, which, to be fair, is probably something to be quite proud of. Well done you.

He did reply when i asked him about this earlier, was something like, "er, well, my friend bought two season tickets, and it was too late not to take it, so I've got to go, and er, um well". Found it a bit far-fetched to be honest. He has a friend??

The facts have all been on here before, the amount paid to Ranson, the huge interest bearing loans paid to Ranson, and previously mentioned myself that Pro-zones figures showed a loss in thie accounts. Some people just didn't want to listen. You were one of them.

How is it backtracking? Cardiff were interested, but not enough to actually pay a decent amount of money for what would amount to a squad player. Still doesn't make him a Premiership player does it? Makes him what he is, a mid to low ranking Championship player, who we've got a lot of money...

The ones with Transformer Lunchboxes and jam sandwiches with the crusts cut off from their mum?

Pretty much what i was saying all along.