Search results

But Gaz, no-one is saying other players are only scoring because of the attention McGoldrick gets. Merely saying it is a factor.

Yep, but as i have said on a number of occasions, because of DMC's goals we have been finding space elsewhere, due to the opposition focusing their attention on stopping him. As an opposition manager when assessing us they would be setting their stall out to stop DMC and give him extra...

We go up and do well in the Championship though, we'll regularly get crowds of around 20,000.

I think Bailey will end up player of the season myself if he carries on like this.

We have no goalscorer today apart from Baker. If we had DMC I would fancy our chances, but we don't. A draw would be great. If we lose (and we of course well might), we simply have to beat Shrewsbury on Tuesday. We owe them one anyway don't we.

We've been a ball alright, but it has been half deflated and hasn't bounced properly at all. MR is the garage attendant who has kindly pumped it back up with air again.

That's what they said about the atom bomb!!

Could that feasibly ever happen though you think?

Being drunk certainly has helped over the years on watching City hasn't it. It's like being given anesthetic before an operation that you keep having to have every two weeks.

Just can't see us scoring many without our main goal threat. Hoping MR has a trick up his sleeve. Maybe Cody Mac will suddenly be unleashed ..... from his dusty dank old rusty dungeon.

Just park in Tesco's for free instead!! And you are now aware that there are parking meters on the streets of Cov. You can be bound sure they would have been put up around HR too!

I am one of the few who much prefers the Ricoh to HR. It's a great stadium and has fantastic views. Once the rail station is built it will become so much easier to get to too. It's just the fact that we don't own it that has caused all the trouble.

I too was going to say defeat Stu, but apparently they have a fair few of their best players out too.

This is one of my main gripes. If CCFC believe the rent should be say £200,000, why on earth don't they just pay the £200,000 and argue about the rest aCL are asking for? Surely that would make more sense than simply refusing to pay anything! Think about it, if we paid £200,000 there would be...

Yeah, you could say it's a bit more cocky than 300.

Think you may be right on the 0-0. 3-1 is rather optimistic I feel with no striker. Seems like we will go for 1 up front and that 1 either being McShuff or Elliot. A draw would be great and I too will plump for 0-0.

Clarke is the better defender. Christie is better coming forwards. It's a close call to be honest.

Yep, Baker's goal then meant Stevenage had to throw everybody forwards and that then allowed DMC the space for the third. Not sure whether the captaincy or MR or a combination of both has brought out the best in the lad. He is finally scoring goals at last and long may that continue.

Just think some payment can keep the sides talking on relatively decent terms, rather than the way things seem to be turning very sour and with a degree of resentment apparently, based on the language we are hearing from the differing camps.

Well that's the way i am thinking. ACL a while back did mentioning paying 'some of the rent.' Surely a gesture can be made of some payment to keep some goodwill and prevent any action against the club while negotiations continue.